I love that she uses the fact that she can’t see as a reason the foundation must be brilliant. I think we need an independent adjudicator on this one.
The comments on the 2011 Guardian feature are clear: do not disagree. Perfectly reasonable discussion earned a telling off which felt overboard and inappropriate.
I would like to edit some of the Guardian copy. The word ‘simply’ was used 4 times in 3 paragraphs in Sali’s takedown of a dissenting commenter. The takedown is 5 or 6 paragraphs. It made the text seem aggressive, as if it were so important to get her argument out into the world before anyone dared agree with the bad apple, that a read through was out of the question. This is an example of personal feelings taking precedent over professional standards. A theme.
The comments on the 2011 Guardian feature are clear: do not disagree. Perfectly reasonable discussion earned a telling off which felt overboard and inappropriate.
I would like to edit some of the Guardian copy. The word ‘simply’ was used 4 times in 3 paragraphs in Sali’s takedown of a dissenting commenter. The takedown is 5 or 6 paragraphs. It made the text seem aggressive, as if it were so important to get her argument out into the world before anyone dared agree with the bad apple, that a read through was out of the question. This is an example of personal feelings taking precedent over professional standards. A theme.
. None of the interview was especially groundbreaking, but I did prick up my ears when Jo mentioned Sali’s “trolling hell” (TM) on a “dragging site”. 
, but she doesn’t seem all that nice herself really. In that very same interview she described herself (when running late for something) as “breathing like you’re on a ventilator”. I mean REALLY? Now?