Commissioning portraits, putting WD-40 on cat flap hinges, hiding his wife's phone and deleting her tweets... He's a busy man!
Sali Hughes #12 This is not a thread. It is not paid for, not sponsored, nor required by Sali
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Sali Hughes Threads Wiki
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Commissioning portraits, putting WD-40 on cat flap hinges, hiding his wife's phone and deleting her tweets... He's a busy man!
The one she kept tagging? Just before the regs on declaring freebies changed? That one? No tit. I don’t think she did pay for that, and if she did, she did not pay the full amount that you or I would pay.
“Now India, you can either have your phone OR the bottle of wine. Not both. Remember what happened last time when you offered my services as a heavy”
Commissioning portraits, putting WD-40 on cat flap hinges, hiding his wife's phone and deleting her tweets... He's a busy man!
Imagine John being shade matched by SH
I heard that at the time and was amazed at that idiot Anne-Marie Lodge. Omg she really revealed the mentality of IG influencers. They actually believe the vacuous tit they spout.
And nobody said she got free clothes, we comment on the fact she got/gets hefty discounts which she said herself. No deep research needed.
Welcome btw! And spot on. I think we all used to quite like her tbh. Something changed.Long time lurker (well since I came here after watching her Instagram melt down), first time poster here. I just can’t take her any more. Has she always been this bad? I used to quite like her (or I was just not tuned into her ways back then), I hate to admit it I’ve even got her books. Her guardian column now drives me insane. It is complete and utter shite. First cream mentioned today £39 for 60ml, which is apparently twice the normal amount. And yet the next two are both 50ml. Even if maths is not your strong point you know 2x50 is not 60.
Never.
But friends and family keep her constantly in the loop. Which is rather unkind of them, dontcha think? Who would do that to a loved one?
Yes, what kind of ally would continually poke like that? A very cruel one
How do you spell Schadenfreude?
How do you spell Schadenfreude?
Yes that is strange. Given that anyone who reads or contributes here is part of the problem. Quite easy to avoid here really isn't it? Just read all the adoring comments from 1000s of IG fans. Isn't that enough?Never.
But friends and family keep her constantly in the loop. Which is rather unkind of them, dontcha think? Who would do that to a loved one?
She entirely gives us too much power
That's what I don't understand. It's not like there are legions of Tattlers commenting on any of her stuff.
I know. It's completely contained, as far as I know
If I moan about someone who irritates me, out of their earshot, that is me moaning. Maybe I have a point, maybe not, but as the old saying goes, people who listen at doors never hear good about themselves. It's not bullying, it's not trolling. What people think of you is none of your business.
However, someone who hears me moaning and rushes back to tell the target of my irritation all about what I've said is a tit stirrer - that's the person who is a false friend. That's the troll. In SH's case, that's her dogwalker.
The way SH tells it, tattle was only set up to talk about her.
However, someone who hears me moaning and rushes back to tell the target of my irritation all about what I've said is a tit stirrer - that's the person who is a false friend. That's the troll. In SH's case, that's her dogwalker.
The way SH tells it, tattle was only set up to talk about her.
Exactly this! No one should expect to be universally adored, particularly someone in the public eye. And yes, the people doing the trolling are indeed those running back to report to her. Or perhaps she's in fact trolling herself
She might get one moody commenter every few months but has quite a sense of victimhood about her.
A few years back (I think) the guardian published data of their journalists being trolled. The journalists who write about abortion, s. assaults etc get horrific abuse - beyond trolling to criminal abuse level, threats of violence etc. SH has people saying makeup is vain in her comment section and tattle and cries wolf like a hack.
Last edited:
And yet there Julia Raeside is on Twitter complaining that Mark Lamarr was horrible to Gail Porter (which he was, but I think she’s hoping we all have short memories about how foul she was to DP)Particularly Julia Raeside one of SH's bezzies
Google her Guardian tv review of Dawn's show and her comments in comments section
Yes I am confused. Pink was bad. Now it’s good. Who wants to be old and pink looking.
So fed up with Sali and others thinking they own/ know about older d sad kin when they are just in their forties. It’s actually massively different from 60.
Last edited:
According to Sali, old and pink via an expensive cream is the way to go, because without it, she repeatedly hammers at us, your skin is sallow, dull and irregular. And old. And probably still covered in spots.
This is SH being sensitive to her 'mature' readers.
This is also Sali setting herself as some kind of expert on mature skin while simultaneously denying such skin exists
- Status