Yeah I don't want to come across as a pain but I've never read anywhere that he was in a teaching capacity at the time. Whilst her blog and posts could drive you crazy and are fair game. Their relationship begins could have huge legal implications if true. So I'd be wary of delving into that.Ah, that makes sense. There is a lot of conjecture up thread, when all the info about the situation is already out there.
That is a real stretch.Maybe he's not a maths teacher now because of this inappropriate relationship. Possible he was in teacher training and then took a change of direction knowing that it wouldn't go down well that he'd shacked up with a former pupil.
I went to the same school as Rebecca (couple years above). The school invites past students to volunteer as “helpers” on the trip. I think there has been some fudging of the ages though, as this trip happens in year 8 (when you’re 12/13?).Apologies i’ve deleted my earlier post. It’s been clarified they met on a school trip but we don’t know in what capacity he was on this trip.
Jesus. So he was 22 or 23?I went to the same school as Rebecca (couple years above). The school invites past students to volunteer as “helpers” on the trip. I think there has been some fudging of the ages though, as this trip happens in year 8 (when you’re 12/13?).
Head teacher denies school trips to Welsh farm house will be cancelled
A head teacher has denied claims that school trips to a popular Welsh farmhouse will be cancelled.www.watfordobserver.co.uk
Agreed, things like this will more than likely get the thread deleted.That is a serious allegation to make, this isn't just a bit of gossip about influencer ethics. I think people need to be careful with what they say.
I thought it had been established that wasn't correct?I'm sorry but 12/13 has got to be incorrect?!
I replied to it and said it was ridiculous that she asks that question because the person who asked it, you blocked.She’s VERY defensive on her blog post today. I have a feeling she’s pissed off that people can see through her!
Absolutely, that part of her blog is complete hogwash. She has a reputation for being shady with her ads because her disclosure in the past has been non existent/ambiguous. She has been reported to ASA on more than one occasion so I would have more respect for her if she had acknowledged that in the blog. She's actually quite good at disclosing now but if you scroll back on her feed, not even very far, there are few ad disclosures. She only started doing it recently.She's not being completely truthful about always having been clear about whether hotel stays were paid for or gifted. She was queen of using ambiguous phrases like "thanks to xyz hotel for having us" or "we were guests of xyz hotel" and that gave no indication whatsoever as to whether they had paid for it or not. I think she's better now at saying whether they've been given a free stay but it's disingenuous to say that this was always the case.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?