A bit off-topic, but I got my masters in English from a Croatian uni, so far from any prestigious British experience. I've been watching Ruby on and off throughout the years and I have always been baffled at how... limited (?) her knowledge of linguistics and literature is. It goes without saying that just because you study something, doesn't mean you are expected to know everything. You are there to learn. But it is so strange to me that, for instance, Ruby in her 3rd year at Exeter didn't even know how to pronounce Chomsky. We covered linguistics, semiotics, structuralism, the whole anthology of literary theory and criticism in the 1st and 2nd trimesters of undergrad in order to be able to use that knowledge in academic writing and the analysis of literary works. I always assumed someone who goes to Exeter or Oxford would be somewhat superior in that aspect, not that their scope of knowledge would be smaller in comparison. I would expect an Oxford student to be more articulate, observant, intelligent, knowledgeable and capable of more in-depth critical thinking, not someone whose interest in academics is almost entirely due to aesthetics.