What annoys me is them saying thereThey don’t mention the fact he’s literally SA’d women because it doesn’t suit their narrative, big red flags from anyone who chooses to ignore the SA and how they view consent
Is no proof we cant just take word of mouth (angela j said this today) when it comes to SA it usually is one word against the other which is one reason a lot of people do not go to police because the do not feel they will be believed- and all the people on tt who have said they dont believe have reinforced this idea by not believing the victims!!! What evidence of SA do they need or want?? Do
They want video evidence? Eye witnesses?? Like i say in most cases it is one word against the other. In this case it is more than one girls word against the beast