I think it's more likely to do with remaining anonymous
I think it's more likely to do with remaining anonymousI don’t know if I want the answer to this, but what’s the pronouns deal with the kids then? (I’m guessing it is performative rather than putting her children’s needs before Twitter entertainment…?)
That’s where her family like to go cruising, and they are all scary perhaps?I wonder why in a more recent tweet thread RM was warning innocent passers-by to avoid the 'scary gay cruising area', if her whole family is supportive.
It really is horrible - I thought the tweets about the kid eating without offering her a bite were bad enough.Yes she is horrible about them. She blames everything else for the eldest's behaviour - poverty, hunger, lockdown, living in rented accommodation, school - without pausing to think for one second that maybe her shitty parenting might be a factor
Ironic she sees herself as the saviour of children with *that* photo©, yet doesn't appear to like her own much at all.
Yep, this need for anonymity is so bloody convenient when she is a a serial liar.I still think she is as much a “Traveller” as me. It’s another discrimination she can claim though, along with disability and being a povvo. If I was a betting person, I would have money on one of her baby daddy’s being one, at best.
I would LOVE a travelling van but they really are not cheap - and they are also very different to caravans and mobile homes that seem to be favoured by the Travellers I am familiar with. The vans they have are usually used for work. Watching conversion videos of vans and old buses and ambulances is one of my favourite Instagram things! They always look like some serious money and skills has gone into them.
Another reason for anonymity is definitely because there are some double claims going off. He is ‘vulnerable’ and she is undoubtedly claiming as single (plus the full LHA allowance that will be coming from benefits which is another grand a month). I wouldn’t want my details bandied about the web if I was spinning as many plates as our canny gobshite.
Anyways - our “scroungers apprentice” is edging in. You would think the sex-positive feminists” they proclaim to be would balk at using such misogynistic terminology but I suppose when you want to be “shocking” it’s the go-to word.
Can someone explain what the point of that word soup was? Thank(space)youThe ones confirming you're bi, they're bi, lots of people are LBGT (capital t, please!), you are from birth but you won't know until you're 18 #ally
She calls herself a traveller with a small t,
When we were very poor we went to pontins, never ever again, I wish they would bar me lol
It's far worse than thatIs it like butlins but shittier?
I've never even been to Butlins, I can't see the appeal. Somewhere even worse makes me shiver. Mind you, the last time I was on a campsite at all was over 10 years ago.It's far worse than that
Honestly think this is another giveaway she’s a bloke…Who describes a woman they're interested in as "my Lesbian love interest" do they think they're a character on Riverdale
I'm starting a hashtag thunderclap: "Mulholland Drive is RSM" truthersHonestly think this is another giveaway she’s a bloke…
Light up trainers can literally kill someone with epilepsy? Is this true?When you're all over the gay scene, but any scene may not be good for your health
According to a quick Google search people have alleged it (maybe trying to get money) but there's no proof that those sorts of shoes do cause seizures.Light up trainers can literally kill someone with epilepsy? Is this true?
RSM cluedo would be a blastLight up trainers can literally kill someone with epilepsy? Is this true?
The lesser known Little Britain character (who was probably omitted because they were poor…For posterity - and because it’s funny!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?