I love all the people from Brazil that kept sending flag emojis when the moderators kept whining about it.
If someone does not understand copyrights and that you cannot use without permissions or licenses, that person should not be making videos.Josh spending the early hours of the new year trying to resolve copyright claims.
“Copyright nonsense” = I want to use someone’s intellectual property for my financial gain.
View attachment 2661791
Seriously though, Every single streamer out there who was filming at or around all that music should have expected to be hit with a ton of claims and their videos blocked. I only feel for the little guy who didn't have thousands in superchats coming in like Josh did. He made his money and then some but his greed says otherwise. He should just let it be.Josh spending the early hours of the new year trying to resolve copyright claims.
“Copyright nonsense” = I want to use someone’s intellectual property for my financial gain.
View attachment 2661791
Hes done that for a couple clips that were uploaded to YT then posted here too. Rules of thee, but not for me.Remind me, didn't he just hit Dad Chronicles with a copyright claim for using his content?
NYE is not worth of a replay to anyone aside from the fireworks and a quick glimpse at what the overall feel is like for those interested in just how chaotic it gets.How many people actually go back and watch the past livestreams? I would imagine it’s not that many? Who wants to go back and watch a NYE stream with the songs cut out after New Years is over? Instead of working through the 85 claims maybe he should just chill and spend New Year Day with his family and new puppy…but since it’s Josh he can never just relax I guess.
I agree, it would be very nice if YouTube forced a return of funds, unfortunately YouTube is also greedy and gets a cut of those.I wish Twitter made them give back their superchats after a copyright strike.
That would be more then welcome, I can think of a good handful that they could start with such as no filming/streaming people in queues, or dining areas. No streaming of children. No passive aggressive retaliation filming. No talking or singing on rides. No rudeness or fighting. Taking the assigned seat and not requesting seats, and keeping their video screen off on rides.It feels like this might be the year Disney puts some strict rules into place for vloggers.
I think the whole thing is hilarious. He’s calling the recording companies greedy for copyright claiming him on youtube. However, he’ll copyright claim DC or anyone else that tries to use his videos in their content.Let me get this straight, it's greedy for publishing companies to want compensation for actual creative work, but it's not greedy for Josh to copyright others who use footage of him walking around Disney property while monetizing content that Disney creates? Ok. Got it. I am so glad we have a screen shot of this rant because I feel he will be editing his word choices after reading here. Happy New Year, Josh! Enjoy editing out the 85 songs you already made thousands off last night in super chats.
I'm not talking about them going after individual vloggers. But maybe something like if you want to live stream from WDW you first need a permit from them. Or there would be some sort of limited number of seasonal/annual permits that vloggers would have to apply for - permits would require vloggers adhering to whatever rules Disney puts down (no getting on rides via someone else's DAS pass, no booking of campsites you're not actually using) and in return they wouldn't get a copyright strike on their vlogs. Or Disney just decides to set up their own live streaming team, building on what they sometimes do for fireworks.It takes something BIG to get their attention to take action. Josh's behavior, while all over the place and very questionable still didn't make the cut - as soon as he (or another streamer) has a physical altercation THEN things will change. Josh has gotten as close as any of them to this. This may be the year someone is taken down to the security office for a talking to.
Disney loves the free publicity they get from all the streamers and vloggers. So there’s going to need to be a big altercation with these people for Disney to change their mind.I'm not talking about them going after individual vloggers. But maybe something like if you want to live stream from WDW you first need a permit from them. Or there would be some sort of limited number of seasonal/annual permits that vloggers would have to apply for - permits would require vloggers adhering to whatever rules Disney puts down (no getting on rides via someone else's DAS pass, no booking of campsites you're not actually using) and in return they wouldn't get a copyright strike on their vlogs. Or Disney just decides to set up their own live streaming team, building on what they sometimes do for fireworks.
I can imagine Disney is getting to the end of its rope with the sheer number of vloggers always in the parks and the issues they're increasing causing for other guests and cast members.
What happened to new year, new Josh he was pontificating about recently? Instead of spending New Years Day with his wife, son and new puppy he’s locked away in his office editing a NYE livestream that’s a carbon copy of all his past ones. He cant leave a penny on the table and like @YesNow said Josh has to have the last word as if he’s in the right all the time