I just had a look in the book - but honestly it made me so angry. She says edies dad got with the boys mum and follows it up with how upset the children were ect and how you couldn’t make it up! She then follows it with a story about how he then got with her best friend (still together now) and how her and Josh were furious ect (even though she broke the relationship to be with Josh - apparently it’s not alright for him to be with whoever he wants).
With regards to the court case - as you would imagine it was the worst court case any person has ever been through in their life, they all sobbed horrendously, vomited horrifically and had panic attacks - and still do if they find anything that reminds them of that time
With regards to the court case - as you would imagine it was the worst court case any person has ever been through in their life, they all sobbed horrendously, vomited horrifically and had panic attacks - and still do if they find anything that reminds them of that time
I’ve not seen anyone defending Rach on here recently.
Are we only allowed to gossip if it’s fits the Rach is responsible for all evils narrative?
As I said it’s funny how the only locals who are believed and accepted are the ones who are telling stories to fit the version of Rach is the the villain. Anyone who gives another side is dismissed.
Yes Rach is a twit. She seems completely clueless about parenting, is irresponsible to the point of neglectful at times. She’s a proven liar and she’s done some crappy stuff in the past.
Also, genuine question, have R or J put anything out there about the boys and their mum and the court case? I haven’t read the book, so don’t know what’s been said?