PTWM #175 £16k a month, but ‘living on fresh air’. Huns, the GoFundMe is just over there…
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
The epitome of all the gear and no idea these two 
Think she has them on upside down to be honestWhat in the actual duck is she wearing on her face?!?
I've zoomed in as the sunglasses really highlight her face and nose, and as for the teeth
I've never seen curly teeth before.
I've never seen curly teeth before.
I remember my eldest son having it years ago when his little brother was in nursery and even though he didnt have it the nursery asked me if I could keep him off until it cleared up as it spreads like wildfire. Especially in younger children who touch everything, put things in their mouth etc etc. And I bet my life shes not using her own towel, face cloth etc like you are supposed to do to stop the spread. I call bingo on E, T and Seb having it next. I will be ok though because he doesnt live there
OMG. Look at that gaping open cut there on Josh's neck. Frightful
.Nope, still can’t deal with those glasses 
I don’t understand if she is not well with conjunctivitis why she would want to go anywhere and not just rest up at home. Or just go for a walk out down to the beach, why bother getting all dressed up and no doubt go for lunch spreading germs and tiring yourself out more?
Because she can
Have you noticed also he tries desperately not to show his teeth anymore? But of course he doesn't read hereLook at Josh eyefucking himself
Because if she's got the opportunity to dump Wilbert off with a babysitter and piss off to love Circumcised Cedric the hardest, she'll never turn it down.
I know the answer to this but disclaimer: I don't want to piss anyone off, so if this applies to anyone - Sorry.
It's common place for couples that are unhappy in their lives to always want to be out of the house. Even if they hate each other, they'd still rather be out in public places together than be inside the home where they don't have to filter how they feel or even worse have nothing to talk about.
Home is not a comfort to them. They don't see it as their safe space. At home they have no option other than to acknowledge that they can not tolerate the very basics of their lives that should have bonded them but hasn't. It's quite often seen in couples that have nothing in common other than their kids. No shared interests, no same future aspirations. The ones that are just existing along side each other, rather than together. Especially in couples that are completely different pages when it comes to the functionality of family life.
They will literally find anywhere to go and if not able, pile the house to the roof full of other people to take their minds of their day to day existence and find anything to avoid the conversation they should have, which is "What are we doing here?"
Anyway, a little bit of relationship/ family Psychology on a wet Sunday
Ducking hell. What an unfortunate pair of twats 
. Josh giving himself the glad eye and old bug eyes grinning away. Not a care in the world.
Wonder which neighbour/cleaner/postman/bin man/bus driver/scout leader/accountant or teacher they've dumped the kids on?! Hopefully one will give them more love and care than tje actual duck wits they were born to.
. Josh giving himself the glad eye and old bug eyes grinning away. Not a care in the world.Wonder which neighbour/cleaner/postman/bin man/bus driver/scout leader/accountant or teacher they've dumped the kids on?! Hopefully one will give them more love and care than tje actual duck wits they were born to.
I know the answer to this but disclaimer: I don't want to piss anyone off, so if this applies to anyone - Sorry.
It's common place for couples that are unhappy in their lives to always want to be out of the house. Even if they hate each other, they'd still rather be out in public places together than be inside the home where they don't have to filter how they feel or even worse have nothing to talk about.
Home is not a comfort to them. They don't see it as their safe space. At home they have no option other than to acknowledge that they can not tolerate the very basics of their lives that should have bonded them but hasn't. It's quite often seen in couples that have nothing in common other than their kids. No shared interests, no same future aspirations. The ones that are just existing along side each other, rather than together. Especially in couples that are completely different pages when it comes to the functionality of family life.
They will literally find anywhere to go and if not able, pile the house to the roof full of other people to take their minds of their day to day existence and find anything to avoid the conversation they should have, which is "What are we doing here?"
Anyway, a little bit of relationship/ family Psychology on a wet Sunday
% agree with this. I know a few couples who do the exact same thing. What a sad existence & what will happen when they’re actually living on ‘fresh air’ & can’t afford to eat out?Edited to add the
is shining in Yorkshire 
---
He’ll be home alone with his dinosaurs & iPad asking where are my familyDucking hell. What an unfortunate pair of twats
Wonder which neighbour/cleaner/postman/bin man/bus driver/scout leader/accountant or teacher they've dumped the kids on?! Hopefully one will give them more love and care than tje actual duck wits they were born to.
Last edited:
I posted about this a few days ago, how Rachel and Jeremy seem to be housing a lot of domestic abuse survivors. This article has popped up whilst I'm searching for something else and it is screaming to me now that this is what they're up to. That text the other day, Jeremy requesting a reference for someone who Rachel doesn't know either? Dodgy as duck. They can claim more housing benefit if they claim to be giving support.
"It has now emerged that some landlords are also claiming housing benefits for people who have moved out of the property, or never existed in the first place, known as ‘ghost tenants’."
"It has now emerged that some landlords are also claiming housing benefits for people who have moved out of the property, or never existed in the first place, known as ‘ghost tenants’."
Rogue landlords falsely claiming millions of pounds for ‘ghost tenants’ - Property Industry Eye
Rogue landlords falsely claiming millions of pounds for ‘ghost tenants’ - Breaking news for estate agents and the residential property industry. Independent, unbiased, and factual reporting. A forum for discussion and debate of topics of the day. Subscribe for our free daily newsletter.
propertyindustryeye.com
All parents but especially influencers could do worse than familiarise themselves with the U N convention if the rights of the child. Rancid pretty much is guilty of them all!
If they are both involved in such a scam I'll bet he wouldn't be impressed with her putting something on instagram. But she just can't help herself, anything to make the huns think what a wonderful job she's doing !! Let's face it just writing a reference will make the huns tell her how hard she's worked and to take a weekend break. JeeezI posted about this a few days ago, how Rachel and Jeremy seem to be housing a lot of domestic abuse survivors. This article has popped up whilst I'm searching for something else and it is screaming to me now that this is what they're up to. That text the other day, Jeremy requesting a reference for someone who Rachel doesn't know either? Dodgy as duck. They can claim more housing benefit if they claim to be giving support.
"It has now emerged that some landlords are also claiming housing benefits for people who have moved out of the property, or never existed in the first place, known as ‘ghost tenants’."
Rogue landlords falsely claiming millions of pounds for ‘ghost tenants’ - Property Industry Eye
Rogue landlords falsely claiming millions of pounds for ‘ghost tenants’ - Breaking news for estate agents and the residential property industry. Independent, unbiased, and factual reporting. A forum for discussion and debate of topics of the day. Subscribe for our free daily newsletter.propertyindustryeye.com
£59 on sweets! That’s some peoples weekly food bill! Also could she not have said Lula came out wearing a bikini instead of a “Calvin Klein bikini”
Why don’t people see this, especially when she is on the beg for cots, bedding, washing machine whatever the hell else she won’t pay for.
keep paying me a monthly fee, buying my books and tit merch, raising money for my Mother in laws op and buying alleged women white goods and I will carry on letting you know how much more money I have and how I spend your weekly shopping budget eating out two days running.
It’s just crazy!
Why don’t people see this, especially when she is on the beg for cots, bedding, washing machine whatever the hell else she won’t pay for.
keep paying me a monthly fee, buying my books and tit merch, raising money for my Mother in laws op and buying alleged women white goods and I will carry on letting you know how much more money I have and how I spend your weekly shopping budget eating out two days running.
It’s just crazy!
Look at my expensive watch. LOOK AT IT!
Attachments
- Status