I feel like the general information they give and online makes out it’s because of your diet/bmi. I had an “overweight” bmi at booking so feel judged. Idk maybe it’s because my fatphobic mum was with me
. I also just don’t really understand as his head and abdominal circumference say 94th centile but his expected weight is average for this stage in pregnancy so I just feel a bit overwhelmed trying to make sense of it all.
In my experience,
Everyone's charts are tailored to them.
So your 94th percentile may be someone else's 40th, or off the chart for someone else.
It takes into consideration your weight/height ect.
Can I ask why 94th percentile baby is a bad thing though? And why you'd feel bad about it?
94th also doesn't mean average.
It means if you were to line 100 babies up born to mums of your height and weight, yours would be 94th in line.
For another person, it would be different.
Your bmi also makes no difference with weight for the baby.
My bmi for my first pregnancy was 56. He was 7lb 8.
My second pregnancy my bmi was 50, she was 11lbs.
My 3rd, my bmi was 39 and she was 6lb 14.
My friends bmi is below 30 and her baby was 9lb.
I was told my 3rd was 90th percentile on the growth scans, estimated at 10lbs.