Might be a photo finish? Mary Lou’s not there yet!
---
---
Attachments
-
33.3 KB
Last edited:
Who is the journalist?There’s 134 billion people in Africa alone how many does she expect Ireland to house
---
Possibly her?Who is the journalist?
I’m not sure that’s what she was saying ? It’s a known fact there’s peados want it recognised as a sexual preference, that’s how I read it.She’s a nutter, suggesting that the + in LGBTQ+ refers to p**dophilia is a bit much. It’s almost as if we don’t have daily reports of convicted p*dos who aren’t gay or trans.
I don’t take much she says too seriously. She’s conflating homosexuality with p**dophilia, that’s how it reads to me. She was going to become a nun at one stage, look at the cruelty they inflicted on women and children over the years. Constantly spouts pro-life but hadn’t got much to say about the Tuam babies.I’m not sure that’s what she was saying ? It’s a known fact there’s peados want it recognised as a sexual preference, that’s how I read it.
She asked what the + stood for ! I’ve seen that queried many times ( no pun) lolI don’t take much she says too seriously. She’s conflating homosexuality with p**dophilia, that’s how it reads to me. She was going to become a nun at one stage, look at the cruelty they inflicted on women and children over the years. Constantly spouts pro-life but hadn’t got much to say about the Tuam babies.
View attachment 2941116
Yeah and then answered her own question by suggesting it stands for p*dos.She asked what the + stood for ! I’ve seen that queried many times ( no pun) lol
Yes but that’s not wrong as any sexual orientation can fall under the + including those groups fighting to be recognised that the rest of us wouldn’t comprehend, read into it it’s eye watering and eye opening.Yeah and then answered her own question by suggesting it stands for p*dos.
No it doesnt!Someone has replied to say it stands for all the other identities. Which is waffle and doesn’t make it clear at all. Its a valid question to ask, but she has gone about it in the wrong way.
Those other letters weren’t accepted at one time there’s people trying to make it acceptable and that’s something we all need to worry about, nobody can define a woman these days, why wouldn’t / couldn’t they force these other ideologies on usIt’s not really valid though, as if p**dophiles are acceptable to anybody else in society but themselves. She knows exactly what she’s doing putting them in the same bracket as gay people.
There’s a huge worldwide movement that thinks they should be accepted because they’re simply attracted to children.People are f**king mental.
Paedophelia is a crime, not a sexual orientation. Children can’t consent to sex and without consent, it’s a crime. A crime cannot be an orientation.
Another day I’d like to step off this planet![]()
Exactly. P**dophilia is and always will be a crime. If a man is attracted to a woman it doesn’t mean he gets to rape her. Same concept. It’s not acceptable and never will be so MP is trying to create controversy where there is none imo.People are f**king mental.
Paedophelia is a crime, not a sexual orientation. Children can’t consent to sex and without consent, it’s a crime. A crime cannot be an orientation.
Another day I’d like to step off this planet![]()