I couldn't bare to look after reading a few. They're awful.God do the ppl commenting on fb have any idea how her family would feel reading them!
I couldn't bare to look after reading a few. They're awful.God do the ppl commenting on fb have any idea how her family would feel reading them!
Give it 5 minutes and there’ll be a theory about why it wasn’t working…How devastating that there was a camera that could have seen everything if it had been working.
Remember there is a bridge that links to the other side of the rivet, not far from the bench.I've never even thought of this house tbh.. simply because it across the river so she would need to go around a long wait to reach it.. but if you think of the bird's-eye view this house has of the river.. the bench.. etc...oh here I go again. Mandatory Mania .!
Perhaps that's for the bestHow devastating that there was a camera that could have seen everything if it had been working.
Because her own profile was set to public, people have been commenting on her photos and posts, even suspicions about her partner. It’s unbelievable.God do the ppl commenting on fb have any idea how her family would feel reading them!
How long until someone imagines that was deliberateHow devastating that there was a camera that could have seen everything if it had been working.
Especially when the lady in red had spoken to the police straight away.To be fair the police don’t help themselves do they? They’re posting a grainy image of a lady in a yellow coat pushing a pram in a small village, 9 days after the event and describing her as potentially as a ‘key witness’. It wouldn’t fill me with confidence either.
I’m not sure hunting her down required a huge effort. bleeping hell….like just pop a message on the village Facebook page eh Colombo?
On her profile? That's awful. I've only seen them on the news posts.Because her own profile was set to public, people have been commenting on her photos and posts, even suspicions about her partner. It’s unbelievable.
Yep. It was mentioned on the thread yesterday, tattlers had looked and she was posting publicly until just before Christmas. Now there are hundreds of comments on her own profile from strangers - all because it’s set to publicOn her profile? That's awful. I've only seen them on the news posts.
is yours a fitbit? Mine is an a to sync even when i’m next to it so i’d imagine the chances of it getting to sync now are pretty slim. It may have had a chance at syncing earlier in the search but I’m sure they say theres also a time limit they can be under forMy watch is fully waterproof to 100m but yes I wonder if that means it would still emit signal/tracking ability? Or just referencing that the actual watch would still work? Regardless, if there's been no sync from it, it points even more conclusively that it's been submerged.
They would need evidence to support the need for a warrant they can’t just say right we’ll search that house. Some people do offer to have their homes and gardens etc searched to look for any signs that the missing person may have been there at some point but this requires the property owners permission and they are within their rights to refuse it if it’s their private property.But if they needed one they would get one surely is what I’m saying. If they needed to get in to have a look wouldn’t they have ?
It wouldn’t be difficult to get a warrant under the circumstances, I’ve known them get one for less.No they can’t without a warrant.
Or taken and disabledMy watch is fully waterproof to 100m but yes I wonder if that means it would still emit signal/tracking ability? Or just referencing that the actual watch would still work? Regardless, if there's been no sync from it, it points even more conclusively that it's been submerged.
No I have a Garmin - I guess it would also depend on whether she had automatic syncing set up or she imported her workouts to Strava manually.is yours a fitbit? Mine is an a to sync even when i’m next to it so i’d imagine the chances of it getting to sync now are pretty slim. It may have had a chance at syncing earlier in the search but I’m sure they say theres also a time limit they can be under for
I couldn't find her profile just then?Yep. It was mentioned on the thread yesterday, tattlers had looked and she was posting publicly until just before Christmas. Now there are hundreds of comments on her own profile from strangers - all because it’s set to public![]()
Maybe we should ask LindaGive it 5 minutes and there’ll be a theory about why it wasn’t working…
After 8 days though surely a warrant has been issued and used if they aren't complaint.They would need evidence to support the need for a warrant they can’t just say right we’ll search that house. Some people do offer to have their homes and gardens etc searched to look for any signs that the missing person may have been there at some point but this requires the property owners permission and they are within their rights to refuse it if it’s their private property.
It wouldn’t be nice to watch but the family would at least have answers. What if they never find her? But have to live with knowing that had the camera been working they would have been spared a lifetime of wondering what happened to her.Perhaps that's for the best![]()
So if we're not doing a wiki - good idea actually because the thread's moving so fast - does whoever starts the next thread want to add the link above because it is a good round up.You might find this helpful to read and anyone else interested about what has happened with the Nicola Bulley case so far.
Shame we can’t attach it to wiki, perhaps it could be posted at the top of the next thread![]()
Everything we know as desperate search for Nicola Bulley enters its second week
Nicola went missing on Friday, January 27, and hasn't been seen sincewww.lancs.live
![]()