Unless you’re part of the Police investigation how do you know for a fact the person hasn’t let them search it.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
God do the ppl commenting on fb have any idea how her family would feel reading them!
In theory I think it would track you but I think most devices are water resistant not water proof? So they cannot actually be submerged for long periods or too deep?
If her device is waterproof then it may prove invaluable.
this is another reason against abduction. if you’re going to abduct someone these days you’ve got to make sure they’re not air tagged or wearing a tracking watch or Fitbit. None of her devices have shown her leaving the riverbank or we’d have been told.
The dog’s ball? No being serious god knows. I just seen a comment saying she’s made contact and asking for Linda then when I went back to screenshot it’s been buried within all the comments.I might regret asking this but who‘s Linda, or is that just a name she’s plucked from an orifice
I mean the police can enter ANY property??
I don’t think there’s any need to stir any memories. It looks like they have already identified everyone who was there that morning and are gathering statements. It’s not like she disappeared in a vast area with multiple potential witnesses.
No they can’t without a warrant.
Well, it’s the capital letters and lack of punctuation that’s really sold it for me…
Dear god I don’t know whether to laugh or cry at the psychic post, so I’ll do both.
Well that information should keep those searching for Nicola busy.
If she‘s that good, you’d have thought she could have said where Nicola is now, as she can’t still be trying to climb up a vine.
I accused the dog of pushing her in earlier FYI
With ref to the ‘suspicious’ van, it was reported on Friday that the police sectioned off a car parks 9 miles from where she was last seen. It was in connection to an unknown vehicle. But they have obviously eliminated it from the enquiry.
Here’s the original story
Here’s the original story
I've never even thought of this house tbh.. simply because it across the river so she would need to go around a long wait to reach it.. but if you think of the bird's-eye view this house has of the river.. the bench.. etc...oh here I go again. Mandatory Mania .!
But if they needed one they would get one surely is what I’m saying. If they needed to get in to have a look wouldn’t they have ?
How devastating that there was a camera that could have seen everything if it had been working.
My watch is fully waterproof to 100m but yes I wonder if that means it would still emit signal/tracking ability? Or just referencing that the actual watch would still work? Regardless, if there's been no sync from it, it points even more conclusively that it's been submerged.
It does make sense but it was her leaving her phone makes me think she got up quickly and hurried down there. I don't think she rolled down either I think she was on foot and just couldn't stop herself.
ETA: That's if she went in the water. I'm still not convinced.
- Status