in photographs on Nicola's FB is shows willow with a tag on on her collar, if she managed to tie the dog up with string she must have seen it, dog tags normally have the dog's name, name, address, tel no of owners?,I’ve wondered why it took so long for the 1st witness (found willow and phone at 9.33) who called her DIL to get the info to the school and family, they found out at 10.50, that’s and hour and 15 mins for a phone call. She’s said she thought it odd when she found them, it was a ladies phone (she saw the screen, she knew the dog) and a dog and harness yet that call to the school took so long, it’s annoying me a bit that she wasn’t a bit more concerned about this lady’s phone or dog.
This is just reminding me of the time when Sarah Everard went missing and sadly found murdered and someone just knew the perpetrator was guilty simply because he was bald and that all bald men are psychopathic.that you're guilty because your beard is too neat
I think this is exactly what happened. All these people that state If they found a dog and phone at 9.30 in the morning would automatically raise the alarm and think something bad had happened, I honestly don’t think I would. I think I’d have strolled on by and I would assume the owner was just around the corner fetching a ball or something and playing with their dog. I don’t think I’d even go as far to secure the dog, I wouldn’t think much of it at first at all.Perhaps the person who tied up Willow asked her dil to check if she was still there as it was niggling her. I'd probably do that, run on to my appointment with that situation in the back of my mind, wondering if the dog had been found by its owner. I probably would assume the owner and dog had become separated on the walk. I don't think I'd immediately assume a person had entered the water.
DIL goes back to check and alarm is raised, because at that point its unusual. Lost dogs are posted on my fb every day of the week, dogs get loose, lost and found.
It would be interesting to know -The DIL didn’t get there until 1050, and when she did she called the school who called Paul.
It’s not clear what time caravan lady called her DIL.
The friend who shared the timeline appealed for other witnesses in that gap.
View attachment 1948794
View attachment 1948795
That abandoned house description gets me every time
the phone signal possibly pinged a different mast, I know from going out on my walks after looking at photographs Ive taken of the area I've walked the description on the location changes depending on where I am in my walkThe police said the phone was 'back' at the bench at 9.20 which made me think they knew it was in the field at some point.
48 hours is a myth. If someone is thought to be missing and it’s out of character and you are concerned you should report it.I've just read in the Daily Mail about the time lag blah blah blah ...... Police didn't get to start their search until 11. Is this true? I thought that if an adult went missing, you had to wait 48hrs before the police cared about it? Has that changed, or is it just because of the dog/phone circumstances in this case?
Can I just say if anything ever happened To me, i do hope that someone like you would be the first at the sceneI’ve found a random dog whilst out running and I had to chase it about half a mile to catch it so I could phone the ownerim not an avid dog fan girl but I had visions of the town facebook page lighting up with posts about a dog being hit by a car so my conscience wouldn’t let me. Put my run right off course as well
if I found a dog therefore with a phone lying nearby and the dogs harness, every alarm bell would be going off in my head. I think my first thought would be the owner has had a medical episode.
I know in the area close to me the majority of retired people who are dog walker's out walking around 9.30, you tend to see the same people on the route the dogs engage and the owners stand have a wee chat before carrying on, so I find it strange that no one came across willow the harness and the phone on the bench between 9.30 and 10.40 especially given it looks like a circular route where its possible to go by the bench twice on your travelsI’m actually wondering why no one saw anything for all that time between when the school was called and the dog was found and tied. Seems a bit strange if it’s a common dog walking route. Also going to backtrack about the woman that tied willow… she had an appointment but was out with her dog. Hm. Like, does she carry string around or did she find it? It’s a bit strange, but so is everything else about this case
I saw a video last night that said the witness that saw Nicola in the upper field noted that he also saw a couple of other people there, and that the dog (willow) was barking at something. Could be nothing, just thought it’s interesting that this was the last known sighting of Nicola and apparently the dog isn’t that much of a barker. Who knows. Perhaps she saw a squirrelThe whole thing is just so odd and there’s literally not much to go on at all
I don't know if I would. Had I found the harness, dog and phone in a town centre I'd be more concerned than if I'd found it in a field, which seems pretty secure like this one. I'd think I'd assume the owner had been caught short and popped behind a bush/tree.I’ve found a random dog whilst out running and I had to chase it about half a mile to catch it so I could phone the ownerim not an avid dog fan girl but I had visions of the town facebook page lighting up with posts about a dog being hit by a car so my conscience wouldn’t let me. Put my run right off course as well
if I found a dog therefore with a phone lying nearby and the dogs harness, every alarm bell would be going off in my head. I think my first thought would be the owner has had a medical episode.
WAS WILLOW WET?In the next thread i think all information on the dog needs to be in CAPITALS?🫠
OR WAS WILLOW DRY?WAS WILLOW WET?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?