I think he is bowling to be recognised as some sort of journalist, because everything else he has done has lead to a dead end.
Frankly I see no depth in what he says, it’s all just for selfish reasons to try to be recognised as some sort of a professional rabbiting on with no great interest in the region, just wanting clicks and likes.
His input will not have any impact on the situation out there whatsoever
He just gets any topic and manically runs with it like the Johnny Depp scenario when he almost hyperventilated
Most people can see right through it
It’s all about him.
diamondtext
Here's Nadia Sawalha shamelessly attempting to legitimise Mark Adderley's ranting fixations on national television: "Mark has one headphone in and whatever he's normally doing
[That would be Pornhub, Nadia.] he's listening to every single bit."
Practising journalist Charlene White: "Really?
![Oops! :oops: :oops:]()
"
Sunetra Sarker's face: WTF?
Nadia Sawalha: "Yeah, then he does a live every night on YouTube and the numbers are building building."
![Face with tears of joy :joy: 😂](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f602.png)
![Face with tears of joy :joy: 😂](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f602.png)
Can you just imagine the production team peeing themselves in the gallery?
I haven't time stamped as Jane Moore and Sunetra Sarker go on to make some useful points about balance. Before Charlene goes on to illustrate their argument by describing how retired journalist Juliet Bremner was able to create gripping
balanced daily summaries of the previous Amber Heard trial and explaining that journalists have a duty of care to their audience. Old Thunder Chops was suitably unimpressed.