Justapeep
VIP Member
Is this for real she looks like a mannequin or a waxwork dummy
Attachments
-
7.3 KB
-
9.3 KB
I don't mean to laugh at someone being mentally lost but we've been waiting for her to do this, she's so predictable. That woman is never going to be happy until she stops wanting what others (SSS) have. She's not mentally lost she's jealous.Dirty delete this morning. First post said be back in a few days as feeling lost mentally then reposts same picture without the woe is me part
Zoe is as bad as Hinch and Solomon for using her child for engagement and attracting family brands. She won’t know how her child will feel until that child is much older and understands concepts such as social media, the dangers of being a child online etc. Zoe is talking rubbish and basically trying to justify why she parades her child online. Talks about phasing their child out when they are older ..too late when the damage is done. The only reason she’s saying that is because teens will have a say in what they like and don’t like, and by then Zoe & her boyfriend will have made enough from online flogging to retire anyway. Kids of Instagram parents have no choice or say and that’s the problem.Just posted this over on the Stacey thread too but thought it was interesting for over here too. Sort of off topic but also not. I’m listening to Zoe Sugg’s vlog from yesterday while I work and had to come and write this. Her and her partner are doing a q&a and one of the questions is about their child being posted online and the way they think about how their child will feel in the future if they look back at a video or photo they posted. If they think their child wouldn’t like it or even if there’s a grey line they don’t post it!! Also how they will phase out how much their child appears on their social media/in videos as they get older (it’s 37mins 55secs in if anyone is interested). I really wish Stacey and Hinch would think about it that way, how would those children feel in the future if they saw some of the things that were posted!!
It's a ridiculous concept, I'm pretty sure that when my son was 96 month old toddler and I'd tried to put him in a ridiculous highchair he'd have told me to fuck off, kicked me and ran awayI’m sorry am I missing something here? Even if the high chairs “grow with the child”, I still don’t understand the point. Just sit the child at the table like normal? I’m so confused!
As I said yesterday this was the whole reason for doing the Q&A, this is what she wanted to get off her chest. The range isn't ready but she's panicking because tend best bubs is advertising all her stuff already. This is basically for the sheep so they don't spend all their money in Stacey's stuff and save some money for hers.
Shut ya Tripp trapp and get wellJesus.
Didn't expect to come back to this thread eating itself over a high chair.
Be that as it may, I can't imagine any 7+ year old willingly sitting on anything other than a normal dining chair to eat.She has two tripp trapp highchairs for the toddler twins. These chairs are circa £400 each and last until around 12 years of age. They are ergonomic and grow with said child. You lower/higher the seat/footrest as they grow.
I actually don’t mind her as much as I used to lol. Never thought I would hear myself say that!
I’d love to know how she’s doing this alone. Where is she sourcing the products, the fabrics, the warehouse etc. How is she managing to mass produce all this crap alone. Putting a few arrows and words on someone else’s designs isn’t going it alone