Very rarely post here as I can't keep up! But the two biggest things for me are:
- the story about the GP who said lots of patients had been able to come off their medication because of hinching and they wished she could be bottled... This upset me initially because it took me years to accept medication for my mental health and stories like this imply it's not necessary. However, it wasn't that long ago she shared a story about being on Sertraline herself (I think, it may have been another brand). Noone should feel the need to share their private medical information just because they are in the public eye, but if she is comfortable sharing it then she could help lots of others realise it's nothing to be ashamed of. Which is a complete contradiction to her book because enjoying cleaning your house is a perfect substitute for medical treatment...
- Unsafe sleeping practices. Several examples I'm sure, but the ones that spring to mind are the photo of her "asleep" sitting on a patio with a sleeping baby Lennie lying on her, and the pics of cots/cribs full of bumpers, soft toys, possibly a snuzpod or similar... That's without mentioning the huge crib with Henry jumping up at it!
An empty cot is a safe cot, despite whatAnyone with receipts, she also said that they stayed in a holiday house up the road , not the 8 bedroom 5k mansion with indoor swimming pool and gym. REALLYWhen she slagged off Wayfair on her stories, some furniture or something she had got from them increased in price after she advertised it. Yes Soph, just like plane tickets, Amazon etc, their prices work in algorithms, if they become popular the prices tick up. Clueless bint.
And also the time she went to Dorset, pretended mad Freda stayed back to housesit her house, then they were outed by a hincher posting a selfie of her and saying something like lovely to see your mum too. Can't remember exact details and can't find the posts to screenshot!
Forcing your children to tend like things to suit your aesthetic…….Now it’s farm animals and tractors cos it’s him he’s fav now
This is such a great point. You would never be able to do a thread like this on me because I do NONE of the above like the majority of decent people. ‘Celebrities’ need to be held accountable for lying. Why should they make a (very successful) living by deceiving people.There would be no need for any of these threads if she…
• was honest and didn’t lie (writing ‘fan’ letters to yourself is just weird behaviour)
• didn’t use her children for content
• actually advertised decent products that were good for the environment and NOT tested on animals, unlike P&G, Unilever etc…
• didn’t fake ‘anxiety’ or lie about hurting her coccyx or apparently breaking her toe…
• wasn’t rude to people who criticise / have questions
• didn’t buy fake followers
People are going to have opinions or dislike you if you put your whole life and family on the internet. I personally wouldn't have an issue with her lifestyle if she was actually a genuine person.
No one sends her abuse, it’s just peoples opinions. None of us are perfect, but this thread highlights a lot…
They really are a blinkered group aren’t they!This right here is how adults discuss things.
Not like the ‘Hinch Army’ set on anyone who dares to have a difference of opinion.
I just feel I have to re-quote this from @Tinkerbell87 with regards to her son Ronnie being 'non verbal' prior to January at least claiming "she wished she could hear his little voice" on her stories (conveniently as usual wiped after 24 hours).Proof she lied about poor Ron being able to talk.
This is what brought me to tattle!
Further to this, the need to lie about Ronnie’s development in terms of hearing.I just feel I have to re-quote this from @Tinkerbell87 with regards to her son Ronnie being 'non verbal' prior to January at least claiming "she wished she could hear his little voice" on her stories (conveniently as usual wiped after 24 hours).
More proof of continual lies as the photo extract shown from her own book clearly says quite the opposite!
I’m sharing this again this morning to emphasise the level to which Sophie alters her appearance.The second for me is the level to which Sophie edits and filters her appearance.
When photos of Sophie are tagged by others who have met her, they are hugely different to anything she herself shares.
The editing of appearance when advertising beauty products and make up is against ASA rules, but Sophie still does it. She uses a filter or app outside of Instagram so a filter name doesn’t appear on her stories.
This is not only misleading, but potentially damaging to other women, and girls, who are watching. To edit your body shape, your looks, your skin, to such a level that is unattainable naturally, is dangerous.
When Sophie shares videos on her stories, you can see the headboard / door frame / mirror frame in the background moving with her. They bow, they bend, they change shape as she moves.
Sophie, if you do choose to read here, please know that you do not need to edit yourself. You are a woman. A mum.
You are not ugly. You are not overweight. We truly hope that you know this.
The photos I am sharing here, side by side natural and then what you share, are to show the level of deceit you choose to maintain. To show the edited version you use to advertise beauty products, against ASA regulations.
I must stress - I do not think you need to do this. You are beautiful.
Story advertising beauty products with a filter
https://tattle.life/threads/mrs-hin...er-account-is-now-just-qvc.24758/post-7185081
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?