He’s given a lot of details so I’d say there is some truth in what he’s saying (time, place etc) but the key detail (selling to a childless couple) rings false. But even then it doesn’t change a single thing. Bunch of perverts sat around fantasising about what they’d like to do given half a chance - standard chat for those types no? It’s why they gravitate to each other? After all the breakthrough in the Vishal Mehrotra case was due to what those sickos revealed when writing letters to each other.
It’s interesting how every six months or so a story pops up to remind everyone that Bruckner is a monster (no argument there) and tying his name to the McCanns without anything actually moving forward.
It’s interesting how every six months or so a story pops up to remind everyone that Bruckner is a monster (no argument there) and tying his name to the McCanns without anything actually moving forward.