Guys, can we please
en masse report Madame to the ASA for not disclosing the Holiday Cottage portion of the vlog as an AD.
The visit to the cottage formed the majority of the vlog yet it is not marked as an AD.
The vlog is 79 mins long. The Cliveden cottage formed 45 minutes of the vlog. How is that not an AD ?
Although the Cliveden visit may be an IG AD for which Lydia was paid, (YT was not a paid segment), the YT vlog was released the night before the IG AD and can therefore be seen as working in conjunction with the IG AD.
It is therefore an undisclosed AD.
It is very much the same situation as the Savoygate debacle for which Lydia was reprimanded.
An IG AD for which she was paid and hidden "TT non-Ad" released a few days after the IG AD.
Talk about not learning a lesson.
The YT vlog does not state Lydia is working with Cliveden in any capacity ie. that she is working with the company on IG and therefore her visit to the cottage very misleading.
View attachment 2548097
View attachment 2548109