People who don’t “get” why the JE trafficking was a crime ..:are part of the bloody problem of acceptance and turning a blind eye. So would she be ok if her daughters - whatever age, let’s say 16 seeing - got trIcked/coerced into sex acts with a middle aged man? I don’t think so! Most (but not all) of the girls had troubled childhoods that made them very vulnerable. But that doesn’t make it any less believable, plus there were others that had an entirely normal childhood which just proves the scale of this. I will not return to the pod now after hearing that she doesn’t bloody understand the JE scandal. That’s a level of thickness I can’t tolerate. You would think especially as a mother to three daughters as well she would be reading enough about it to “get it” as it would spark horror to any mother. Out of interest, what were Anna’s comments?
Yeah you’re so right. Most of them were picked from troubled backgrounds and were either directly paid in cash or he forced them to stay longer term by paying for their education, knowing they were desperate to work their way out of poverty /
tit family circumstances. It’s really reprehensible and the poor girls have struggled enough, one of his first prosecutions he managed to wangle it out of child sex abuse / trafficking and into soliciting prostitutes, so his victims were branded as prostitutes not rape victims who could prosecute him, purely as they had accepted payment which is a whole new way of re victimising them and tbh must have been compounding trauma on trauma at the time
She wants to tread carefully with these views as they are really dangerous and anti women, she is steering out of Katie Hopkins lite territory into out and out KH substitute
![Face vomiting :face_vomiting: 🤮](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f92e.png)