if she thinks the girl’s age is the only thing in question here then she really is clueless. I thought she said she watched the Epstein documentary she seems so uninformed. I think she‘s weirdly linking her sexual experiences with older (married) men with this in some weird way and doesn’t see the difference/doesn’t see anything wrong with it. This is trafficking Luisa, not a girl’s choice! she was really annoying on the pod to be honest, Anna is so much more refreshing when talking about her holiday and family etc. Luisa is so up herself, showing off at every opportunity, talking about how hungover she is (obviously not spending too much time with the kids then), and their private chef. Obviously when you’re married your money is shared but I take pride in the fact that when we go away I have also contributed significantly to thingsDid anyone listen to this weeks pod? Chatting about Prince Andrew and Epstein and Luisa said “I mean she was 17 when he supposedly slept with her, that’s above 16, it’s not a big deal, it’s legal”. I’m honestly shocked they let it go out. A) she was trafficked! B) he abused the girl in New York, where legal age is 18. Honestly, her stupidity astounds me.
I mean, Luisa is a dick for many reasons but not that post. I think that person needs to get a gripShe's had a big argument with a 'troll' on her Instagram today. I'm not sure if it was someone on here or not but it was a bit of an odd criticism. The person was criticising her for making reference to celebrating women's achievements. I don't personally think there is anything wrong with that, but this person's opinion was that she shouldn't value women only by their achievements. Luisa got quite upset by it. Which is a bit strange because while it was an odd criticism it wasn't the worst thing someone could have said (and probably has said) to her!
I think she actually cares very much what people think of her.
Yeah, she has bucket loads of internalised misogyny as it is & but with this I feel really quite sad for her, it's likely if she's been with much older men (especially those with other power imbalances such as influence/fame/money) she has been exploited in some ways in the past and could do with proper therapy to help process that. It doesn't matter if it was legal, it's very likely her experiences were still abuse, loaded with grooming & coercion, very much wrong and shouldn't have happened to her.if she thinks the girl’s age is the only thing in question here then she really is clueless. I thought she said she watched the Epstein documentary she seems so uninformed. I think she‘s weirdly linking her sexual experiences with older (married) men with this in some weird way and doesn’t see the difference/doesn’t see anything wrong with it. This is trafficking Luisa, not a girl’s choice! she was really annoying on the pod to be honest, Anna is so much more refreshing when talking about her holiday and family etc. Luisa is so up herself, showing off at every opportunity, talking about how hungover she is (obviously not spending too much time with the kids then), and their private chef. Obviously when you’re married your money is shared but I take pride in the fact that when we go away I have also contributed significantly to things
I too found this to be quite uninformed. A trafficked girl/woman cannot consent to a sexual encounter because she is being held against her will and forced to sleep with people or perform sexual acts. Age, although a factor of the allegation, is not the whole story.Did anyone listen to this weeks pod? Chatting about Prince Andrew and Epstein and Luisa said “I mean she was 17 when he supposedly slept with her, that’s above 16, it’s not a big deal, it’s legal”. I’m honestly shocked they let it go out. A) she was trafficked! B) he abused the girl in New York, where legal age is 18. Honestly, her stupidity astounds me.
It was terrifying how misinformed she was. I don’t understand why they aired it.I too found this to be quite uninformed. A trafficked girl/woman cannot consent to a sexual encounter because she is being held against her will and forced to sleep with people or perform sexual acts. Age, although a factor of the allegation, is not the whole story.
Luisa wants to be the new Katie Hopkins, since there’s an opening on social media now. I think she just likes to be contrary. I don’t mind her honesty, but I do think she is wrong on this one.
This whole thing is mental btw- why would they air this? It’s like saying I don’t see the issue with someone being raped because they were over the age of 18 so its not abuse - no that is not how it works.I too found this to be quite uninformed. A trafficked girl/woman cannot consent to a sexual encounter because she is being held against her will and forced to sleep with people or perform sexual acts. Age, although a factor of the allegation, is not the whole story.
Luisa wants to be the new Katie Hopkins, since there’s an opening on social media now. I think she just likes to be contrary. I don’t mind her honesty, but I do think she is wrong on this one.
This really made me mad! How dare she say it’s legal so ok.Did anyone listen to this weeks pod? Chatting about Prince Andrew and Epstein and Luisa said “I mean she was 17 when he supposedly slept with her, that’s above 16, it’s not a big deal, it’s legal”. I’m honestly shocked they let it go out. A) she was trafficked! B) he abused the girl in New York, where legal age is 18. Honestly, her stupidity astounds me.
Because in her eyes as long as they’re being paid (for sex) she thinks it’s ok. Shows you where her morals lie & says heaps about how she thinks relationships work.This really made me mad! How dare she say it’s legal so ok.
Would she be so flippant if it were her daughters? I think not.
She might be 17 but it was a man that’s old enough to be her father for gods sake!
Anyone that thinks this is ok is sick
It'd be particularly embarrassing if they have to make redundancies/budget cuts, which just happens in any business but particularly now, and the wife is on social media posting crass stuff. How embarrassing for him tbh. I'm sure she'll imply it's from her own company, the one riddled with tens of thousands of pounds worth of debt looool.She’s mentioned before people at his work grass her up and talk about her to him which must be so embarrassing for him.
Luisa to a T!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?