They’re bloody idiots
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
mark is just a Letby fanboy who has popped up recently for the free Lucy campaign. He posts in one of the Facebook groups but also on Twitter and youtube. But seems like this is only since the verdicts.
my friend James Walker seems to have disappeared since he left that fbook group.
He’s debunking the white one now & says he’s got a non redacted copy that shows that someone else harmed the babies. The deluded twit
---
No sense at all
Attachments
“Contains information that will only be given to the appeal once the appeal is underway”?He’s debunking the white one now & says he’s got a non redacted copy that shows that someone else harmed the babies. The deluded twit
---
No sense at all
I don’t think it works like that, mate. If they don’t know the basis for your appeal, they can’t allow your appeal…
He’s debunking the white one now & says he’s got a non redacted copy that shows that someone else harmed the babies. The deluded twit
---
No sense at all
Just a quick update. I’ve reported the Joker. I’ll let you know if I hear anything more about it. The Evil clown 
Isn’t the note just redacted for press release - and they would have seen the unredacted version in court?He’s debunking the white one now & says he’s got a non redacted copy that shows that someone else harmed the babies. The deluded twit
---
No sense at all
Getting inspector Gadget vibes more than Sherlock Holmes, not gonna lie
Yes I think they would have seen the original in court. Haha definitely
The world would be a much better place if the strange people just got a hobby, stamp collecting, train spotting, anything. Too many people with far too much time on their idle hands.
ummmm, so she’s not real? What is she then? A robot? An alien?
'Kin hell, people have had counter terrorism police crashing through their doors for posting that sort of racist bile.Why is it that literally all of the Letby defenders are either
1) Thick as mince
2) Conspiracy theorists
3) White supremacists
4) All of the above
?
Below are some of the other tweets from “the joker”, I’ve put them behind a spoiler because they’re genuinely some of the most vile things I’ve ever read
Seriously, this is the man who everyone is currently praising for “debunking” the confession note
The only other category of Lucifer simp I can think of is the middle aged, thirsty bloke
EXCLUSIVE How Lucy Letby's legal aid cost nearly £1million: Serial killer benefitted from £980,000 … # via https://android.com
Didn't our favourite statistician claim she couldn't afford a defence?
Didn't our favourite statistician claim she couldn't afford a defence?
I don't think the link works but it's in the daily mail.EXCLUSIVE How Lucy Letby's legal aid cost nearly £1million: Serial killer benefitted from £980,000 … # via https://android.com
Didn't our favourite statistician claim she couldn't afford a defence?
I can't read the link but I assume that was paid by the government since everyone has the right to be defended.EXCLUSIVE How Lucy Letby's legal aid cost nearly £1million: Serial killer benefitted from £980,000 … # via https://android.com
Didn't our favourite statistician claim she couldn't afford a defence?
Frankly I would ask for my tax money back that went into her defence. A blind snail would have done a better job frankly. I am all for her being guilty but I believe her case could've been defended a little better.
How so, given that she's guilty and also agreed to the facts that BM was initially disputing, e.g. the insulin?
I think Ben Myers did the best with what he had. It’s not his fault his client put her foot in it on the stand and made him look a fool by disputing agreed facts. He was doing fairly well up until then and definitely casting lots of doubt imo. She obviously wasn’t credible enough that other professionals wanted to speak in her defence.
I’m interested in how she could have had a better defence too
she was guilty AF anyone can see that, how could she have been defended better? He couldn’t magic up evidence to prove her innocence and he did a decent job of casting doubt until she took to the stand.As the old adage goes, you can’t polish a turd. Like others have said, I think BM did the best he could with what he had - I am happy her defence cost so much tbh, shows she had a fair a trial as she could have with the best possible representation, another up yours for the conspiracy theorists who said it was sub-par.
Also, as value for money - 9 month trial and all of the work that went into it and beforehand, £1m ain’t bad for making sure an evil child killer is banged up for life and unable to hurt any others.
Her defence needed an expert witness to cast doubt on the medical evidence, I don't believe they didn't consult a neonalist just that all medical opinions came back that the baby's were attacked while Lucy was there. Therefore BM could only use a plumber as he was the only witness who wasn't going to end up backing up the prosecution.
- Status