- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
apparently youâre not allowed to call them thick, which is ironic because at-least what Iâm saying is based on actual evidence 
Not to mention that to appeal a court order you have to have been one of the parties involved in the first place. So unless Letters agrees then theyâre wasting time . Cretins
Convinced they are just a bunch of fraudulent scammers. Their four areas of rebuttal are laughable, and their knowledge of science is poor.
Total catfish. He looked a bit Paul Hollywoody - these days he looks like Paulâs been knocking back the cooking sherry and living in a shedThatâs Midlife Crisis Mark!!
Oh thatâs not a good look Marky, the word Catfish comes to mind!
No wonder heâs obsessed with Lucifer, theyâd make a great pair theyâre both Catfishes!
Heâs aged a bit since his twitter photo
---
Him or his spy has obviously been looking at Tattle, heâs very defensive of Middle aged men
---
Last edited:
Apologies if this has been already asked. Was there any evidence heard in court that wasnât reported on. Damning evidence etc ? Would love to hear what bits we didnât get to hear.
If she is real at all
Ok, slightly weird request....if I want to respond to people talking about R Hill as though he's some kind of oracle of truth and is spreading The Good Word about LL (I know he isn't, he is clearly an absolute bellend spouting misinformation) - what can I say that will help them see that? There's a few true crime groups mentioning him as a counteraction and as though he is spouting facts, but I *know* that's not the case. But what can I say that will support my argument?! I don't think me saying he's a bellend and can you not read and see what a knob he is will really cut it...
If these people are blindly believing his rubbish, I really donât think theyâre the type of people who youâre going to be able to reason with in the first place Iâm afraid.
It's the internet, it's impossible to be wrong in your own mind if you're willing to argue enough. People will never accept defeat, especially nutters who follow that rag tag bunch of lemons. Definitely not worth bothering with.
Exactly. They've just put their own spin on it and changed a few words here and there to make it fit. They are truly hopeless, apart from the fact they are scamming people out of money, they are just laughable really.
Theyâre now saying the part where it says âthey usedâ as in âhow can things ever be how they used to beâ is âthey accusedâ (as in the police) & apparently they were told by the police thatâs what it said. Absolute b*ll*cks!
The police won't have told them anything at all. And yet they hope the gullible saps believe this utter shite.Theyâre now saying the part where it says âthey usedâ as in âhow can things ever be how they used to beâ is âthey accusedâ (as in the police) & apparently they were told by the police thatâs what it said. Absolute b*ll*cks!
I hope they continue going down the rabbit hole of the notes and they waste even more of their time in such pointless facts.Theyâre now saying the part where it says âthey usedâ as in âhow can things ever be how they used to beâ is âthey accusedâ (as in the police) & apparently they were told by the police thatâs what it said. Absolute b*ll*cks!
We should provide them with even more creative alternative options for transliterating the notes I think. That will help them.
Tbf I think he's been day drinking for two decades. I think the day drinking explains much. From his inability to brush his hair, shave or shower right through to the inability to top up his leccy meter or conceive of a cogent thought...and this last one explains the Letby obsession.
Doesn't really make sense "How can things ever be how they accused, they won't, I killed them on purpose" surely she would just write "Falsely accused of killing babies".Theyâre now saying the part where it says âthey usedâ as in âhow can things ever be how they used to beâ is âthey accusedâ (as in the police) & apparently they were told by the police thatâs what it said. Absolute b*ll*cks!
Is this mark person new to the Facebook groups? Are his YouTubes new? I donât remember him being mentioned before (Iâm not in the groups, only lasted about a week in October so anyone still managing it I salute you as you have far more tolerance/patience than me!!)
I've only noticed him since the verdict tbh.
Iâve still not read everything, who is mark? Have the crazy Jamesâ not had anything to say since the verdicts?
Just had to go balls deep, but it seems Midlife Mark first tweeted about her on 19th August - a new obsession ignited (heâs tweeted A LOT since then)
- Status