I think they might be relatives. In the pic on facebook they are very young.The birthday advert in the paper that someone posted in the last thread was from Tom and Matt wasn't it? I assumed they were her friends?
I think they might be relatives. In the pic on facebook they are very young.The birthday advert in the paper that someone posted in the last thread was from Tom and Matt wasn't it? I assumed they were her friends?
Do Tom and Matt have the same last names?I think they might be relatives. In the pic on facebook they are very young.
Yes. There is a pic of them in 2017. They are clearly children/teens. So i think they could be her cousins maybe?Do Tom and Matt have the same last names?
Are there tho? Like what? I understand that a lot of serial killers claim after the fact that there was a trigger point but oftentimes that’s just them trying to explain or justify after the fact. For example Peter Sutcliffe said he was robbed by a prostitute and that was the trigger for him to start killing prostitutes. The police thought he was lying about that and just trying to explain it after the fact. They thought the truth was that he just fantasised about it for ages and did it for sexual gratification.Things lead up to it though. There are usually small signs.
Im sure I’ve seen a snippet from a news channel saying it was found on her phone?Things have got twisted… all it said was she took a photo of the babies. Nowhere has it said it was on her phone but it’s been assumed and then repeated.
Defence.Defence or prosecution?
Absolutely, I forgot about CPAP!
Why because you said so?Just caught up on the thread HOW are people still thinking that she is innocent after todays events. She is an evil witch and anyone trying to make excuses for her should be ashamed of themselves.
Just found the picture, I also think cousins. Bit strange to add them to the note don’t you think? I guess she was very close to them?Yes. There is a pic of them in 2017. They are clearly children/teens. So i think they could be her cousins maybe?
Also I assume she would have been in a union which to provide legal cover. But not sure the extent of circumstances that they would help.Everyone who is arrested has the right to legal aid. Most criminal cases are legally aided - Ben Myers will be funded by legal aid and so will her solicitors.
Nice objective stance there, thanks for your input!Just caught up on the thread HOW are people still thinking that she is innocent after todays events. She is an evil witch and anyone trying to make excuses for her should be ashamed of themselves.
Interesting. So according to the date this 21st Birthday message was posted on 31 Dec 2010 she would have been born late December 1989/early Jan 1990. Not important in the scheme of things but I'm sure at some point, prob after the trial there will be programmes etc and background/social information.@avabella
Totally correct Thomas and Matthew. Still no idea who that is. A previous poster said she found their accounts did they look like friends?
@avabella
Totally correct Thomas and Matthew. Still no idea who that is. A previous poster said she found their accounts did they look like friends?
I heard they could be half brothers ( on Web sleuths ) . I have nothing to back this up though.Yes. There is a pic of them in 2017. They are clearly children/teens. So i think they could be her cousins maybe?
Cringe postJust caught up on the thread HOW are people still thinking that she is innocent after todays events. She is an evil witch and anyone trying to make excuses for her should be ashamed of themselves.
this is from the live reporting earlier. There’s no context so we don’t why or how she did it. It might be dodgy, but it might not, we don’t knowIm sure I’ve seen a snippet from a news channel saying it was found on her phone?
Her parents are still together though so that wouldn’t make much sense.I heard they could be half brothers ( on Web sleuths ) . I have nothing to back this up though.
Let me try find it, I’ve been following the live feed rather than watching the news I just came across it whilst browsing.this is from the live reporting earlier. There’s no context so we don’t why or how she did it. It might be dodgy, but it might not, we don’t know
I’m assuming the answers to these questions will be presented as evidence by the prosecution and hopefully clear up some of those pointsThere's a thread about the case in the medicine subreddit on Reddit. One of the mods is a neonatal nurse and she doesn't see anything conclusive in the medical info so far: