That makes it sounds as if Letby took a picture of the parents in a cotthis is from the live reporting earlier. There’s no context so we don’t why or how she did it. It might be dodgy, but it might not, we don’t know
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I realised you meant defence after I posted but forgot to edit.
yes it’s on tiktok but from sky news states it was found on her phone. Unless this is wrong information as hasn’t been in the live feed. Personally, I don’t feel it would of been mentioned had it not been suspicious behaviour ie on her phone. If LL was asked to take a picture by the parents on their own phone or a ward camera that’s different.
Maybe the boys are nephews. Dad is older than mum so they could be dad’s grandchildren.
The main question I keep coming back to is…
According to the prosecution, they are using the fact that whilst she was on holiday for a week in June 2016 there was no deaths. But looking at this timeline of alleged murders/ attempts there is nothing in December 2015, January 2016, March 2016 and May 2016. So where was Lucy Letby during this time and what was she doing? They have used one week when she was away as the reason for no deaths. Yet here are 16 weeks here where she surely would be there with nothing suspicious happening at all?
According to the prosecution, they are using the fact that whilst she was on holiday for a week in June 2016 there was no deaths. But looking at this timeline of alleged murders/ attempts there is nothing in December 2015, January 2016, March 2016 and May 2016. So where was Lucy Letby during this time and what was she doing? They have used one week when she was away as the reason for no deaths. Yet here are 16 weeks here where she surely would be there with nothing suspicious happening at all?
Attachments
Do nurses have work phones? I agree it's strange that they are highlighting it if it's a normal thing that's done.
I don’t believe it’s unusual for photographs to be taken of deceased babies in NICU. I know someone personally who lost her baby at a few weeks old and the hospital took photographs of her baby and she cherishes those photographs it’s all she has.
It seems there isn’t any actual evidence to prove she’s a murderer (so far).
It seems there isn’t any actual evidence to prove she’s a murderer (so far).
It might’ve been in her phone but I’m sure they did get it wrong at least partly. They said took a picture of two of the deceased babies together, but wasn’t one still alive?
Nice to see the “you should all be ashamed of yourselves” posts have started early… 🥱
Day 4 of a six month trial. At least try to reserve judgement until the actual evidence and defence is heard. Or you know, you do you.
Day 4 of a six month trial. At least try to reserve judgement until the actual evidence and defence is heard. Or you know, you do you.
They were triplets 2 died
Yes exactly!You’d think sky’s own reporting would match up wouldn’t you
I agree, I'm not convinced yet and I don't think the post it note is a smoking gun. I do wonder what else the prosecution have up their sleeve, will be interesting to see it build.
If the hospital was just negligent and the deaths were due to general inadequate care and Trust failings, it is a strange and I think quite unlikely coincidence that LL was the only member of staff at every death?
Why are people arguing and being petty on a thread discussing the murder and assault of over a dozen babies?
As another poster has said, it’s not unusual for photos to be taken but is suggested it’s her own phone.
God that is so unbearably heartbreaking
Oh okay I thought I had read she took a picture of a deceased baby with their sibling who was still alive at the time
Lucy Letby #5
Two threads in one day! Continuing from thread 4. Today the prosecution finalised their opening statements leaving us tattlers shocked at a note found in a search of Lucy's house on her first arrest. The defence has given the first half of their opening statements and is set to resume tomorrow...
tattle.life
the note it looks like it says ‘i killed them on purpose because I am not good enough to care for them’ you could argue that means you were incompetent at your job so they died because you simply didn’t feel trained enough. However nurses does that still not fall on your own responsibilities to do something about it? If you felt you kept making mistakes that ended up in death would you not do something about it? So for that theory she’d need some kind of evidence of stating she needed more training etc? But she has already text someone to say she wasn’t challenged enough so it doesn’t really stand. No explanation for saying you did it on purpose though that bit just seems calculated
- Status