All of this a million times over. There is soooooo much we clearly aren’t privy to due to the reporting which became clear in the cross.
Also, these people want to believe her account on the stand during her evidence right? During this same evidence she was confirmed she agreed with the expert evidence and that a number of these babies did in fact due from what they have concluded. But her defence is just that it wasn’t her. HOW can you possibly disregard all the other bits of evidence?
It would be like them finding multiple stabbing victims & the same last person to always be with them, who had searched them all on Fb, taken personal things from them & kept them, to be texting friends about accidental stabbings, drafting sympathy messages for someone that was still current alive but not actually being caught physically stabbing them & their defence, among their many lies, being “yes but it wasn’t me”. How reasonable is it that there was someone else? It’s not reasonable at all.
It’s not reasonable here either.
Also, the bit where she put the form in about the plug being off & it possible it could be accidental air embolism for one of the babies? I thought she didn’t know what one was? I swear she said that at one point