Itâs not about whether they were shagging or if she was wearing her pjs, itâs about her lying and being manipulative on the stand.
her actual evidence (reported by Dan OâDonohue) was she was taken away in her pyjamas.
View attachment 2229517
This is a lie, she was allowed to put a tracksuit on over the top or was already wearing it, and so it seems she is trying to manipulate the jury into how badly treated she was at the time of her arrest.
she has also massively down played her relationship with Dr NN. Forgot to mention the trip to London during her defence. It doesnât matter if they were shagging or not, we donât need evidence of that. Their relationship was totally inappropriate for a married man. Meals, meet ups in various towns, a second trip to London planned but cancelled, love hearts on messages.
View attachment 2229515
With the sympathy message, yes itâs my understanding it was written for their birthday a year later. The third baby was alive and away from Lucy. But who writes a sympathy message for a baby thatâs still alive? Itâs sick!!! They are saying she included the third baby in the sympathy message because it had always been her intention to kill all 3.
The proof of her lying and manipulating over things that are relatively minor, what you call petty things, are actually very strong for the prosecution. She canât even be honest about really simple things. Why should the jury believe her word over anything. She has zero credibility.