Well, respectfully, no, it’s a definite digital footprint that shows she swiped her card at the door to come in at 10.15. So at 10.15 we know exactly where she was. But we do not know, other than her account, where she was prior to that.
I can see how I am biased in the way I’m viewing it, and if it was another doctor or nurse I’d be inclined to believe them. 1 because they aren’t on trial and I see no reason for them to lie, 2, they’re under oath to tell the truth and 3, collectively, the prosecution’s witnesses and the agreed evidence all tallys, where at the moment, LL is the one giving anomalies in her recounting. Which (again I can see I’m biased, and I haven’t heard the whole defence so it might be corroborated). As a 4th I’d say that others’ witness statements have been consistent too. And, as a 5; we have evidence of Dr Gibbs accepting where he may have made a mistake and trusting his colleagues version of events, which to me shows a lack of defensiveness, humility and professional courtesy. Whereas at the moment, LL claims to have only done no wrong and wasted no time in throwing colleagues under the bus but paying lip service to professional collegitness. To me, whilst I realise the gravity of her charges, that makes me suspicious of her testimony.