Even when back at Chester for 5 days the baby was fine. Lucy was absent from work those 5 days.So when the babies moved from the hospital they improved. Not just when they were apart from Lucy?
I don't know yet, the prosecution will always swing it to make it sound like she's guilty - that's their case. But I sometimes need to remind myself that there's always 2 sides!Reading the live feeds ( Judith moritz) on twitter between working and honestly I think she’s guilty !! I don’t even feel like I need to think about it anymore.
Babies were still dying after she left. At higher then normal rates. Will try and find the article I saw it mentioned.I just can’t comprehend the idea of Lucy being a scapegoat. If that was the case, why did babies stop dying when she was moved from the neonatal duties and placed in admin? If a hospital was failing so badly we would still see babies dying after she was moved or even after she was arrested, they magically just can’t stop being incompetent and negligent as soon as Lucy was chosen as the scapegoat. Regardless if it was a day shift, a night shift, or if the babies already had issues when born , when each baby died, the only common theme was that Lucy was the attending nurse.
I think this case is different to Beverly Allit as Beverly was known to be a terrible nurse, disturbed mentally, attention seeking and a general malingerer, so it wasn’t such a But with Lucy she was so thoroughly trained and clearly knew so much about child healthcare that people can’t deal with the fact she would kill babies.
This is what I am interested in knowing. There are 'facts' and 'statistics' presented but only in a very one sided way.Babies were still dying after she left. At higher then normal rates. Will try and find the article I saw it mentioned.
Gonna have a good look cause I 100% seen that even up til 2019 there was abnormally high death rates at the hospital.This is what I am interested in knowing. There are 'facts' and 'statistics' presented but only in a very one sided way.
Just playing devils advocate - maybe she had texted a friend to say 'does this look ok to send?' etc. I could see myself snapping a pic of something to send a pal.Why would she want a photo of a sympathy card she had sent!?
Can you let us know if you find the stats. Really interested to know the death rates for the years leading up to, during and afterGonna have a good look cause I 100% seen that even up til 2019 there was abnormally high death rates at the hospital.
This is what I’m starting to thinkI Think it’s not an either or. Both the hospital was massively negligent and she is also a murderer. She should never have been allowed to continue as she did. How did the hospital let this happen? I think she exploited the weaknesses in the hospital
I think they have to take it to trial though if she's pled not guilty don't they?I was really unsure but the more I think about it the prosecutors must be pretty certain it’s her before dragging all those parents through this trial to relive the most tragic heart wrenching part of their life all over again in such a cruel wayit seems to me the hospital also had failings too!
That was my line of thinking too. Again, in isolation it can be nothing sinister, but I guess the prosecution will try and argue it into the bigger picture. I imagine the defence will try and say exactly thisJust playing devils advocate - maybe she had texted a friend to say 'does this look ok to send?' etc. I could see myself snapping a pic of something to send a pal.