She will love the excuse to go back to working from her soft office again though - that fancy pants office was a complete waste of time and money.totally agree..What on earth will she do no soft play.. no pottering round treasure shops in cute village , no trips to be a London boss lady.. Oh dear how sad... duck off you stupid woman.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
This insta story rubbed me the wrong way, she favours Darcy so much itâs such ashame for Pearl, that poor child, theyâre both going to grow up and resent Louise
Attachments
Was just thinking thatwhy is Liam holding her stomach like that?
Itâs such a shame, she could have just put âlovely day out with Liam and Pearlâ and thatâs that. We know she or at least someone from her team reads here; stop publicly favouring one child!!
Does anyone know if sheâs still friends with Esther?
Or BrummyMummy Emma
Or Zoe
Or that actual real Author (can't remember her name
)Or Zoe
Or Saccone Jonys
Or any of the original Brit crew.....
Very good point - she's into feminism only when it has positive effects for her
She looks dead behind the eyes. You know that saying. No sparkle. No nothing. I think she's down, depressed, whatever you want to call it. Doing the bare minimum to keep all her social media ticking over as best she can.
I cringed. Pearl is going to read all this one day and see the blatant favouritism, bless her
Probably why she wants Darcy back, gotta milk the cash cow whilst she's young!
People talk about Louise putting Darcy in loads of ads and how shes probably happier at her dads, but surely Matt needs to give consent to Darcy being in all of these ads? Louise could hardly do it if he has an issue.
Do you think louise has put some of the money from the ads aside for darceys future and maybe thats why mat agreed to it? (if he has)
âFocussed Pearlie timeââ WTAF
She basically took crap Halloween pics and made an excuse. If she really genuinely considered their welfare, she would keep them out of the spotlight altogether.
*This*
Why don't these Instamums understand that their children will one day see all of this? It's not difficult to comprehend. One day your child will have the internet to hand. One day your child will be able to read.
I remember post her split with Matt she posted something asking people to watch their comments as future Darcy might one day read it. She remembered once, probably just doesnât care anymoreShe basically took crap Halloween pics and made an excuse. If she really genuinely considered their welfare, she would keep them out of the spotlight altogether.
*This*
Why don't these Instamums understand that their children will one day see all of this? It's not difficult to comprehend. One day your child will have the internet to hand. One day your child will be able to read.
Regarding her passive aggressive comments where she lists all the good sheâs done is just completely pointless.
At the end of the day, she creates her success by exploiting her children and posting their image and information without any informed consent. So it doesnât matter if she donates millions to charity, up cycles every item in her house, is friendly to every fan, it just doesnât matter because the bottom line is that she isnât giving her children the chance to privacy and is using their image for paid ads. The same goes for any family vloggers or mumfluencers, if you are getting any kind of monetary gain from your childâs image, then itâs exploitation.
I donât really have an issue with many Youtubers or influencers, as itâs their business and their image but family vloggers are just awful.
You cannot be a family vlogger or a mummy blogger, use your childâs image for cash/views and be a morally good person or a responsible parent. And Louise is one of the worst as her whole image is âwholesome relatable Mum!â but any good she does will always be cancelled out by the fact that Darcy and Pearl will never have a right to their privacy for the rest of their lives because of their Mum.
p.s. Louise was the last of the Brit crew I stopped watching. I loved her and I do think she can be funny but it doesnât matter because Iâve grown up and realised how morally wrong it is to essentially sell your childâs privacy and image.
At the end of the day, she creates her success by exploiting her children and posting their image and information without any informed consent. So it doesnât matter if she donates millions to charity, up cycles every item in her house, is friendly to every fan, it just doesnât matter because the bottom line is that she isnât giving her children the chance to privacy and is using their image for paid ads. The same goes for any family vloggers or mumfluencers, if you are getting any kind of monetary gain from your childâs image, then itâs exploitation.
I donât really have an issue with many Youtubers or influencers, as itâs their business and their image but family vloggers are just awful.
You cannot be a family vlogger or a mummy blogger, use your childâs image for cash/views and be a morally good person or a responsible parent. And Louise is one of the worst as her whole image is âwholesome relatable Mum!â but any good she does will always be cancelled out by the fact that Darcy and Pearl will never have a right to their privacy for the rest of their lives because of their Mum.
p.s. Louise was the last of the Brit crew I stopped watching. I loved her and I do think she can be funny but it doesnât matter because Iâve grown up and realised how morally wrong it is to essentially sell your childâs privacy and image.
- Status