Katie Price #361 skank calls it fate, but grifting, poncing and noncing seems to be a family trait

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
The Neath hotel posted this below, then had to limit comments and delete most of them as they were so bad šŸ¤¦šŸ½ā€ā™€ļøšŸ˜Theyā€˜ve left a couple up from the #BeKind fans though.

When will people learn that any support for Skank, or using her as promotion will generate an immense amount of negativity. She is hated, and for good reasons, a drunk driver, a bankrupt not paying her debts, yet living a millionaire lifestyle, has stolen her two youngest children from their father and refused him access to them, her behaviour in public is abhorrent, a washed-up has-been, still trying to live off her celebrity status 20 years ago. A foul-mouthed drunk and ā„ addled waste of space, more and more members of the public are seeing this, yet still we get this support of her, a support that will just bring you condemnation. Read the headlines people, you do not want to be associated with this woeful human, heavy criticism comes with her in abundance now, you gonna get badly burnt on SM šŸ¤¦šŸ½ā€ā™€ļø

Gee, still these companies, organisations, clubs, hotels etc just donā€™t get it, and are surprised by the bad publicity she will bring them. I guess everyone is just a Troll though, not telling it as it is šŸ¤¦šŸ½ā€ā™€ļø

View attachment 2785960
I bet the poor sods in the room next to them didn't feel the same way! Didn't skanky say someone had been and complained about the noise they were making? And that was BEFORE they went out and got sozzled!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 28
Yes, come back Schmooze. I can only think the latest HMRC announcement and this court date are connected but not sure how. I would love to think her house is being divvied up finally or it's turning criminal but maybe not.
Here I am Krusties! Still reading every post on every thread! So trying to unpick the latest hearing. Itā€™s to do with her original bankruptcy as itā€™s 19-1040 number so itā€™s her 2019 bankruptcy that sheā€™s still undischarged from. Itā€™s some sort of ā€œapplicationā€ and someone has posted details of ā€œrespondentsā€ although I canā€™t see where that has been found. If so I can only imagine itā€™s the Trustee of her first bankruptcy applying possibly for the private examination of said respondents or a formal application for them to deliver information to the Trustee? Donā€™t think she has to attend but if the respondent thing is correct then itā€™s putting said respondents right in the thick of her mess and shows the Trustee is not letting up. There is of then of course her public examination set down (even I canā€™t keep up with all the dates) but I think another bankruptcy petition is set down before that for yet another bankruptcy order to be made on the petition of HMRC. Regarding this new HMRC one - trust me when I say this, that hasnā€™t happened overnight. It was lodged in late 2023 I think which means that for her self assessment tax it can be only relating to the period after her first bankruptcy in late 2019 to April 2020 tax year plus 20/21 tax year and 2021/22 tax year as the 2022/23 tax year wasnā€™t due by then. So since her bankruptcy in late 2019 my guess is she hasnā€™t submitted and/or paid self assessment tax so estimated assessments have been raised by HMRC and in addition it said there was a VAT debt. This is where HMRC have been able to prove that she has been running a business (which contrary to what some people might think is not a bankruptcy offence in itself ) that should have been VAT registered and she either hasnā€™t filed returns or even registered (my guess) so they have raised estimated assessments that then havenā€™t been paid. Again my guess is that all of those action by HMRC were taking place for the whole of last year if not before, estimated assessments for both VAT and SA, pressing letters and her ignoring the lot! Hence why the amounts are huge. Doubt she actually owes that but if you donā€™t file they raise massive assessments. Being bankrupt for a second time is not that rare but while being undischarged from a first bankruptcy is rare as @DC has said. The bankruptcies wonā€™t be amalgamated they will be two separate cases but as I think someone has pointed out I think the second bankruptcy then takes precedent and any claims in the first bankruptcy are claims in the second. Not sure if same trustee can be appointed as could be a conflict of interest? Even Iā€™m stumped on that one. Either way sheā€™s a shower of shite. Iā€™d be amazed if investigation a la Boris Becker wasnā€™t currently ongoing but need to be patient on that one as could take ages. Hoping the press can do some digging into this hearing tomorrow as they have previously reported a short while after so hopefully they have some court contacts? So sorry itā€™s so long. Love to all apart from the Skank and the enablers. X
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Wow
Reactions: 110
Here I am Krusties! Still reading every post on every thread! So trying to unpick the latest hearing. Itā€™s to do with her original bankruptcy as itā€™s 19-1040 number so itā€™s her 2019 bankruptcy that sheā€™s still undischarged from. Itā€™s some sort of ā€œapplicationā€ and someone has posted details of ā€œrespondentsā€ although I canā€™t see where that has been found. If so I can only imagine itā€™s the Trustee of her first bankruptcy applying possibly for the private examination of said respondents or a formal application for them to deliver information to the Trustee? Donā€™t think she has to attend but if the respondent thing is correct then itā€™s putting said respondents right in the thick of her mess and shows the Trustee is not letting up. There is of then of course her public examination set down (even I canā€™t keep up with all the dates) but I think another bankruptcy petition is set down before that for yet another bankruptcy order to be made on the petition of HMRC. Regarding this new HMRC one - trust me when I say this, that hasnā€™t happened overnight. It was lodged in late 2023 I think which means that for her self assessment tax it can be only relating to the period after her first bankruptcy in late 2019 to April 2020 tax year plus 20/21 tax year and 2021/22 tax year as the 2022/23 tax year wasnā€™t due by then. So since her bankruptcy in late 2019 my guess is she hasnā€™t submitted and/or paid self assessment tax so estimated assessments have been raised by HMRC and in addition it said there was a VAT debt. This is where HMRC have been able to prove that she has been running a business (which contrary to what some people might think is not a bankruptcy offence in itself ) that should have been VAT registered and she either hasnā€™t filed returns or even registered (my guess) so they have raised estimated assessments that then havenā€™t been paid. Again my guess is that all of those action by HMRC were taking place for the whole of last year if not before, estimated assessments for both VAT and SA, pressing letters and her ignoring the lot! Hence why the amounts are huge. Doubt she actually owes that but if you donā€™t file they raise massive assessments. Being bankrupt for a second time is not that rare but while being undischarged from a first bankruptcy is rare as @DC has said. The bankruptcies wonā€™t be amalgamated they will be two separate cases but as I think someone has pointed out I think the second bankruptcy then takes precedent and any claims in the first bankruptcy are claims in the second. Not sure if same trustee can be appointed as could be a conflict of interest? Even Iā€™m stumped on that one. Either way sheā€™s a shower of shite. Iā€™d be amazed if investigation a la Boris Becker wasnā€™t currently ongoing but need to be patient on that one as could take ages. Hoping the press can do some digging into this hearing tomorrow as they have previously reported a short while after so hopefully they have some court contacts? So sorry itā€™s so long. Love to all apart from the Skank and the enablers. X
Thanks Schmooze. So, could tomorrowā€™s hearing be a winding up of the first bankruptcy to join it to the second? Looking at her assets (no not those ones!), I guessing that there will not be any money to pay HMRC let alone the other creditors, so would they amalgamate the claims?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30
Geez! The sheer difference in the size and shape of them šŸ˜± - did she actually bother looking before allowing the photo to be published? Also it looks with the shadowing on the shorts, that she has wet herself there!
It's probably the first time she seen it tbh, it's not like she can look down to see and she's not one to be looking in the mirror at herself. Don't forget most people are so shocked at how normal and like one of us she is šŸ¤£šŸ¤£šŸ¤£
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 24
Here I am Krusties! Still reading every post on every thread! So trying to unpick the latest hearing. Itā€™s to do with her original bankruptcy as itā€™s 19-1040 number so itā€™s her 2019 bankruptcy that sheā€™s still undischarged from. Itā€™s some sort of ā€œapplicationā€ and someone has posted details of ā€œrespondentsā€ although I canā€™t see where that has been found. If so I can only imagine itā€™s the Trustee of her first bankruptcy applying possibly for the private examination of said respondents or a formal application for them to deliver information to the Trustee? Donā€™t think she has to attend but if the respondent thing is correct then itā€™s putting said respondents right in the thick of her mess and shows the Trustee is not letting up. There is of then of course her public examination set down (even I canā€™t keep up with all the dates) but I think another bankruptcy petition is set down before that for yet another bankruptcy order to be made on the petition of HMRC. Regarding this new HMRC one - trust me when I say this, that hasnā€™t happened overnight. It was lodged in late 2023 I think which means that for her self assessment tax it can be only relating to the period after her first bankruptcy in late 2019 to April 2020 tax year plus 20/21 tax year and 2021/22 tax year as the 2022/23 tax year wasnā€™t due by then. So since her bankruptcy in late 2019 my guess is she hasnā€™t submitted and/or paid self assessment tax so estimated assessments have been raised by HMRC and in addition it said there was a VAT debt. This is where HMRC have been able to prove that she has been running a business (which contrary to what some people might think is not a bankruptcy offence in itself ) that should have been VAT registered and she either hasnā€™t filed returns or even registered (my guess) so they have raised estimated assessments that then havenā€™t been paid. Again my guess is that all of those action by HMRC were taking place for the whole of last year if not before, estimated assessments for both VAT and SA, pressing letters and her ignoring the lot! Hence why the amounts are huge. Doubt she actually owes that but if you donā€™t file they raise massive assessments. Being bankrupt for a second time is not that rare but while being undischarged from a first bankruptcy is rare as @DC has said. The bankruptcies wonā€™t be amalgamated they will be two separate cases but as I think someone has pointed out I think the second bankruptcy then takes precedent and any claims in the first bankruptcy are claims in the second. Not sure if same trustee can be appointed as could be a conflict of interest? Even Iā€™m stumped on that one. Either way sheā€™s a shower of shite. Iā€™d be amazed if investigation a la Boris Becker wasnā€™t currently ongoing but need to be patient on that one as could take ages. Hoping the press can do some digging into this hearing tomorrow as they have previously reported a short while after so hopefully they have some court contacts? So sorry itā€™s so long. Love to all apart from the Skank and the enablers. X
Love it when you post Schmooze šŸ™Œ
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 40
Here I am Krusties! Still reading every post on every thread! So trying to unpick the latest hearing. Itā€™s to do with her original bankruptcy as itā€™s 19-1040 number so itā€™s her 2019 bankruptcy that sheā€™s still undischarged from. Itā€™s some sort of ā€œapplicationā€ and someone has posted details of ā€œrespondentsā€ although I canā€™t see where that has been found. If so I can only imagine itā€™s the Trustee of her first bankruptcy applying possibly for the private examination of said respondents or a formal application for them to deliver information to the Trustee? Donā€™t think she has to attend but if the respondent thing is correct then itā€™s putting said respondents right in the thick of her mess and shows the Trustee is not letting up. There is of then of course her public examination set down (even I canā€™t keep up with all the dates) but I think another bankruptcy petition is set down before that for yet another bankruptcy order to be made on the petition of HMRC. Regarding this new HMRC one - trust me when I say this, that hasnā€™t happened overnight. It was lodged in late 2023 I think which means that for her self assessment tax it can be only relating to the period after her first bankruptcy in late 2019 to April 2020 tax year plus 20/21 tax year and 2021/22 tax year as the 2022/23 tax year wasnā€™t due by then. So since her bankruptcy in late 2019 my guess is she hasnā€™t submitted and/or paid self assessment tax so estimated assessments have been raised by HMRC and in addition it said there was a VAT debt. This is where HMRC have been able to prove that she has been running a business (which contrary to what some people might think is not a bankruptcy offence in itself ) that should have been VAT registered and she either hasnā€™t filed returns or even registered (my guess) so they have raised estimated assessments that then havenā€™t been paid. Again my guess is that all of those action by HMRC were taking place for the whole of last year if not before, estimated assessments for both VAT and SA, pressing letters and her ignoring the lot! Hence why the amounts are huge. Doubt she actually owes that but if you donā€™t file they raise massive assessments. Being bankrupt for a second time is not that rare but while being undischarged from a first bankruptcy is rare as @DC has said. The bankruptcies wonā€™t be amalgamated they will be two separate cases but as I think someone has pointed out I think the second bankruptcy then takes precedent and any claims in the first bankruptcy are claims in the second. Not sure if same trustee can be appointed as could be a conflict of interest? Even Iā€™m stumped on that one. Either way sheā€™s a shower of shite. Iā€™d be amazed if investigation a la Boris Becker wasnā€™t currently ongoing but need to be patient on that one as could take ages. Hoping the press can do some digging into this hearing tomorrow as they have previously reported a short while after so hopefully they have some court contacts? So sorry itā€™s so long. Love to all apart from the Skank and the enablers. X
That's great, thanks Schmooze! If there was an investigation for the original bankruptcy and an investigation by HMRC would they work together do you know? Or would that not happen? I've been hoping a bit too much two teams of fraud investigators are on to her šŸ˜†
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 27
Slightly related to the Skanky one. Kanye's bird has been flashing her bits in public and there's debate about whether she could be prosecuted. Same thing KP has done over the years and worse by sticking a Nokia up her crevice in public. Comments are not sympathetic, saying they should be on a register or she should be in a mental health ward!

View attachment 2785926
But I bet only Kipper could get herself kicked off a nudist beach ā˜ŗ
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 25
Bit busy, but hereā€™s a quick recap of the last thread, itā€™s hotting up for Madam, and not in a good way šŸ˜ˆ

Basically, this happened. There were absolute scenes as videos, photos and comments from Skank and Chloeā€™s appearance at the Neath club night last Saturday were revealed.
View attachment 2785678View attachment 2785680

Mayhem at the club was exposed by secret undercover Tattle reporters @JaynieDay and @MrJayneDay as they filmed a few superb videos, showing Skank on stage singing atrociously (always a given šŸ¤¦šŸ½ā€ā™€ļøšŸ˜) and trying to cajole the young crowd into pervy interactions including spitting in each otherā€™s mouths. As it descended into a drunken confused chaos, Skank was ushered off the stage by bouncers. Chloe was nowhere to be seen, staying well out of the unfolding mess.



The Red Tops picked up on the story and really nailed her. The Scum taste blood nowā€¦.

View attachment 2785686

While Skank made an absolute twit of herself, Chloe looked like she wanted to be anywhere but in Neath.

View attachment 2785687

Skank is still pulling the strings with regard to the fake relationship, the incredibly dim Lego-headed Kryten, giving her a helping hand by posting a cryptic load of šŸ’© on IG.

Sweet lovinā€™ over cards in a pub on a Monday night, lover-boy Crawl now just a distant memoryā€¦

View attachment 2785691

Onward we go, a court case has appeared out of nowhere, happening tomorrow, the podcast is also due out on Thursday, where Iā€™m sure all these exciting stories will be fully explained as Edna chuckles away, gonna be a good one @DC16 šŸ¤¦šŸ½ā€ā™€ļøšŸ˜ and we await the OK magazine article where Skank tells us how she has found her ā€œPrince Charmingā€ā€¦.will he accompany her to court tomorrow šŸ¤” šŸ˜

View attachment 2785701
She will arrive in a fur coat and a rent rolls ro
View attachment 2786098
The bottom of Grant looks like the pastry lid on an uncooked apple pie.
I'm sorry but I'm getting C Jenner vibes here šŸ™ˆ, the face, the leg's.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 18
Sorry if already posted, DM ran the story. Sorry still don't know how to upload properly šŸ™ˆ

The toe-curling moment Katie Price quizzes fans on their 'sex lives' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowb...night-Wales.html?ito=native_share_article-top
Poor Jaynie - she was mistaken for a fan! :LOL: And 0h My you lot have been busy commenting (cough cough)
This spin is great, saying 'she was escorted off the stage' and 'She was escorted out of the night-club' lol. Someone said 'The club hardly sold any tickets for KP and it was only when we also invited Chloe S. along that sales went up! Then there was 'Fancy getting chucked out of a club in Neath!' (oh dear šŸ˜•)
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 38
The Neath hotel posted this below, then had to limit comments and delete most of them as they were so bad šŸ¤¦šŸ½ā€ā™€ļøšŸ˜Theyā€˜ve left a couple up from the #BeKind fans though.

When will people learn that any support for Skank, or using her as promotion will generate an immense amount of negativity. She is hated, and for good reasons, a drunk driver, a bankrupt not paying her debts, yet living a millionaire lifestyle, has stolen her two youngest children from their father and refused him access to them, her behaviour in public is abhorrent, a washed-up has-been, still trying to live off her celebrity status 20 years ago. A foul-mouthed drunk and ā„ addled waste of space, more and more members of the public are seeing this, yet still we get this support of her, a support that will just bring you condemnation. Read the headlines people, you do not want to be associated with this woeful human, heavy criticism comes with her in abundance now, you gonna get badly burnt on SM šŸ¤¦šŸ½ā€ā™€ļø

Gee, still these companies, organisations, clubs, hotels etc just donā€™t get it, and are surprised by the bad publicity she will bring them. I guess everyone is just a Troll though, not telling it as it is šŸ¤¦šŸ½ā€ā™€ļø

View attachment 2785960
What the hell is she wearing loo was it fancy dress night
---
Theyā€™re in totally different postcodes šŸ¤£
Diffrent bra sizes as well lol
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 16
The state of her hair (or lack of)! Plus, wasnā€™t she in the salon earlier in the day getting a blow dry? Why TF do they even bother šŸ˜”
 

Attachments

  • Like
  • Sick
  • Haha
Reactions: 40
Those Neath lads n lasses were slow to get up on stage, but faster getting off again. The lad with 'Colombia' on the back of his tee-shirt led the mass exodus with a nose-dive (ironically) šŸ¤£
This is bleeping gold i love it Skanky manky bleep totally looking like a complete idiot and pissed as duck hilarious she caused utter chaos lol
---
The state of her hair (or lack of)! Plus, wasnā€™t she in the salon earlier in the day getting a blow dry? Why TF do they even bother šŸ˜”
WTF state of that hair bald spots growing and extensions look crap as usual shes falling apart šŸ¤£šŸ¤£šŸ¤£
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 23
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.