So he's not quite as stoopid and desperate as we'd thought then?
So he's not quite as stoopid and desperate as we'd thought then?No, not back together, believe it was someone else
I very very rarely if ever before have commented in the discussions about the younger children as I said I’ve worked in this area and things that I have witnessed are heartbreaking and sometimes so bizarre yet at the same time understandable. I had to leave my job after a few years as it was affecting my own family life, I found it difficult to shut down after work and felt I was responsible for personally saving everyone as it seemed nobody was doing anything fast enough for my liking.My heart is breaking at this point, whether it is true or not. It DOES go on. These children are living in a cesspit that they cannot climb out from without help. As I hear, they are both crying out for help online, but as the law moves slowly they have to wait. I get it - they have to tick every box in order to have a tight conviction,but I hope the end isn't far off. We stand with KH in his fight to get them back. Keep fighting, keep on believing Krusties - we can help get these children back where they belong.
Danny has twin girls but not sure if he lives near KP ( for Bunny to go to school)Bunnys saying she with her cousin, does Daniel have children and could he be looking after the children whilst she’s away in Newcastle?
Plus looks like KP has a new Egg out Friday not heard of sinceDanny has twin girls but not sure if he lives near KP ( for Bunny to go to school)
My girl is 14 and I’d never in a million years refer to her as that. It’s definitely sexualising her. Not a chance.I’m grossed out by AFP’s description of Skank as a 14 year old temptress. Irrespective of what I think of Skank, you can see how she became who she is. A child is never a “temptress”, sexualising a 14 year old girl is wrong. Even if it is the Skank, it is still wrong. I’m not looking for an argument, but I refuse to allow the sexualisation of a child to pass.
I love it!!!! Junior was there tooA bit of light relief.....here's Pete ya Cunt invited to billionaire Phones4U boss John Caudwell's party at his £250million mansion. What does our Skanky get invited to?....fuck all......I love iiiitttttttt!!!!!
View attachment 2704265
Completely agree, the misogyny from that Matt guy radiates through it all.Might be an unpopular opinion but I actually hate F4J. They SHOULD be doing good work to counter parental alienation but there’s always simmering misogyny in the background. I was pleased they were “helping” KH as they do have some clout, but the way they have overstepped and violated the privacy of vulnerable children shows just what type of people they are. They want to “win” at any and all cost. JMO.
Lock all the doors and windows! That foghorn gob of hers will be heard miles awaycan’t believe the Skank is not far from me now
Pete is often at events with that guy. Think maybe Claire manages him tooI love it!!!! Junior was there too
KP with someone else or CW with a trog-a-like?No, not back together, believe it was someone else
@The dog's doodah or perhaps she just kept her own name after she got married. Not at all uncommon, only one of my friends (all around SP's age) have changed their name after marriage. I'm happy to defend her on this one!Just my opinion but Albert's haircut. He looks like a little girl in SFP's latest insta story. Also, I think it was mentioned before, but funny how the boring beige biffer still goes by the name Price, even though shes now married, shouldn't it be Brooks? Another one of the Clampett's trying to make coin off the back of skanky.
Oh yes you're right. Fab. Just saw a lovely pic of Junior on PA'S instagram. And one with Jimmy Choo.... Shame Skank couldn't have gone to show the main man of footwear her new gifted embellished "Chanel" crocs posted the other day. They were a thing of pure hideousness....to match the owner.love it!!!! Junior was there too
Claire was there too, they support his charity the Caldwell Children’s TrustPete is often at events with that guy. Think maybe Claire manages him too
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?