Well she doesn't even remember her own kids birthdays, so what change has Jeyda got?I bet Jeyda did tell her it was her birthday, but she won’t have remembered as not about her
. She is in cloud cuckoo land - still thinks she looks after 5 children, when two of them don't even live with her!
It’s funny because people only think of his dads career in terms of over here. There are more countries that exist in the world than this shit hole. Ha. He was massive in Australia and worked with some big names. The guy did well for himself and invested wisely. Junior is obviously close to him. I think it’s a shame he gets some stick on here, he seems like a really lovely young lad to me.
And her specialised subject: The CON's of Katie Price & how we get away with hiding money from creditors & tax office.I'm all caught upxx.
The pic of AFP in the chair made me think of doing a Mastermind pic, after about ten mins I gave up lol..it's not the best but thought I share lol
View attachment 2527964
The whole clan are in this up to their enabling necks Willow,,, not just the exploitation of H but the ongoing J&B custody saga. They like to portray a nice wholesome loving family unit to the public but behind the scenes their just a nasty bunch of grifting con artists that will use anyone and anything to maintain the lifestyle other people have paid for. The clan will stick up and enable skank until skank gets cancelled and it looks like that has started there's no TV work, no stories (all lifted from social media and tiktoks) no big advertising or corporate sponsors willing to back her ideas, the only thing skank has left is her shitty podcasts with edna the occasional TV interview her selling JYY crap and a few quid coming in from tiktok. This latest H tiktok isn't his it's skanks because she knows it'll get lots of views even more than hers and that means advertising money and who's going to be in charge of that mummy dearest H's momager.If anyone else posted these sorts of thing online, like she has, there would be severe repercussions . A disabled, mentally challenged adult, half naked, swearing, jumping about etc, being laughed at & filmed by his own mother & her aggressive partner. This is abuse & humiliation. The poor young man has no privacy or dignity. They are clearly taunting & winding Harvey up. Offering him alcohol too. WHY is nobody in authority doing anything? How can anyone support her & think she’s a great mother? Clearly SFP knows about this, that means so do Mr PP & AFP do too. SFP now being a parent & the rest of the Price clan are totally despicable. Putting a drugged up, drunk trollop before young children & a very vulnerable young man. Hang your ugly heads in shame. I know you’re reading this madam frumpy dumpling Sophie Price. I AM FUMING.
Isn’t she, really really really rattled
does she not really remember?Denyinguse again, that was 6 years ago……….F*CKING LIAR
The constant single mum of 5 comments started when it was announced Emily was pregnant - with Petes 5th child .... she is obsessedWell she doesn't even remember her own kids birthdays, so what change has Jeyda got?
StuntmanWhen sink boy and skank first went public he did have a bio on a talent agency website (wish i knew how to screenshot at the time) that read.
Reality TV star.
Male model.
TV and film extra.
Stuntman.
Luxury car dealer and globetrotting business man.
So anything possible think that's why skank hired him also the same talent agency sock boy Boyson was with. Coincidence
Thank you, that does make it a bit clearer, especially the distinction between a private process ( Kieran) and the authorities having their own proceedings to place the kids. I didn't know one would supersede the other. That is terribly sad if it's what's happening and I think some of us predicted months back she was risking her kids going into care by reporting Kieran for all sorts of things!I can try… it would be the same circumstances as if they were going into care really. The threshold is very high for removal from a parent and local authorities do whatever they can to keep children with their parents. You would think that there would be enough evidence in this situation but unfortunately children stay in much worse situations for much longerIf there are private proceedings going on then they will be looking at the parents, they wouldn’t be assessing other family members ordinarily.
The local authority involved could also be looking at issuing their own care proceedings which would then supersede any private proceedings going on and they would assess other family members put forward. These assessments are often done before going to court as part of the public law outline process, which is basically when the local authority gives a parent a last chance to sort out their shit before going to court and asks for details of family members to be assessed.
If the relatives say no there is not much the local authority can do but they could still be deemed as suitable to support the children.
Not sure that I answered your question very well lol but I’d like to think her time is up soon!
Maybe something is being done, finally?Well that was a new load of nuts wasn’t it, now a social worker watching her talk absoluteand blatant lies, WTF….she does not have 5 kids living with her, why is she constantly saying that, f*cking nutter, how does she still have B & J, she’s a bloody massive danger to them if you ask me
and soap, shampoo and deodorant- she hates them!Don't worry - we'll form a protective circle around you, she can't take us all down
