@Rita Chevrolet But we don't know that they're NOT doing anything. Child Protection/Welfare etc work under strictly confidential protocols. NO ONE involved in his care will be discussing it outside meetings with the exact professionals who need to know.
Exactly this.
She's probably already had notification of a fine for his non attendance, she's hardly likely to publicise it. Or pay it.
The school can't share any information.
I've said it before but I'll say it again.
In the grand scheme of things, 12 weeks' absence isn't really anything. Obviously it's not ideal for Jett, but it's not cause for panic. The behaviour and attendance teams (or whatever they're called now) wouldn't bat an eyelid at that, it's a tiny amount of time.
Plus Jett can't be forced in to school if he's absolutely refusing, he'll simply walk out again.
And do it every time.
Hopefully the school are trying to work with her (and there's no reason to believe otherwise), and with Jett. But forcing him in isn't the answer.
We know she won't be cooperative unless it suits whatever poor me narrative she's working on.
Safeguarding at that home is a bigger concern in my mind than missing lessons.
(And a reminder that bunny/Bunty seems to be the only source for Jett being kept back a year. It's only January, and it's a very rare thing to happen in the UK. Primary schools are usually mixed ability classes in general (with exceptions for literacy, numeracy) are all kids performing below the national' average' kept back? Of course not. I'll believe it when it happens. It sounds more like something price would tease him with out of malice).