Not brilliant but look at page 21 where I’ve posted this and it’s a little clearer
Not brilliant but look at page 21 where I’ve posted this and it’s a little clearerI've tried to brighten this. Am I right in thinking the top line is 'JAKE Q'. What's with thexxxx?
Has anybody got some anti-blurring software or can make this sharper?
View attachment 2757354View attachment 2757355
Obviously sucking somebody off then!It’ll be her reply to ITV that’s the thread of emails between them.
Looks like 'Jake Q - Availability'.Not brilliant but look at page 21 where I’ve posted this and it’s a little clearer
What a very professional font to useVery professional from Polly putting this on her stories. I know you can’t see it totally but the two people she’s in contact with regarding Fakeys ‘availability’, one is from LW and the other from ITV Win, so same shit just a different day
…euuuuuuuughhhhh!Was it this one? It's still on Insanomy
and that says it all. Reshares the same reels with Spud over and over again but doesn’t bother to reshare his Valentine's post to Flappy and the engagement on that really is piss poorsick of seeing the reel with Leo
Don't worry I caught it earlier! Still catching up.He looked happier and went to more effort videoing and creaming/creeping over that young boxer than his Valentine posts to Flaps…
…he dirty deleted now as I’m sure Flaps threw a fit!….
anyone managed to capture it?
He’s not the full shilling telling people to follow a random sixteen year oldWas it this one? It's still on Insanomy
Thing is the lad might not have realised he was going to put it out in the public domain like that. He doesn’t realise that Fakey doesn’t actually have anywhere near a million genuine followers seeing itWonder if the lads family thought it was creepy and told him to delete itHe really is such a freak and a 35 year old man looking overly excited definitely gives perv vibes
Surely this is against GDPR, if not, it’s against client confidentiality?I've tried to brighten this. Am I right in thinking the top line is 'JAKE Q'. What's with thexxxx?
Has anybody got some anti-blurring software or can make this sharper?
View attachment 2757354View attachment 2757355
There you go, a blurry but still shown as evidence xHe looked happier and went to more effort videoing and creaming/creeping over that young boxer than his Valentine posts to Flaps…
…he dirty deleted now as I’m sure Flaps threw a fit!….
anyone managed to capture it?
It needs putting onto the wikiDon't worry I caught it earlier! Still catching up.
Jesus Christ, the look on his face.Surely this is against GDPR, if not, it’s against client confidentiality?
---
There you go, a blurry but still shown as evidence x
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?