Yeh, there's literally no way she came up with them.She can't be serious? I had to google search when they started, in 2006, as I know zilch about them.
Last edited:
Yeh, there's literally no way she came up with them.She can't be serious? I had to google search when they started, in 2006, as I know zilch about them.
I worked in two different definitely academic institutions and the use of Professor and Dr as name prefixes in email and letterhead signatures was standard. Post-nominals, no. My current job demands a degree and no post-nominals are used as degrees are normal. Everyone was on first name terms everywhere but an email or letterhead signature is a different thing.I work in sort of academia most technical / research staff have at least a first degree, PhDs are common as are Professorships no one puts their academic quals on anything unless it is external and it is all first name terms Your guy would get the P taken![]()
I am pretty sure it was not JM who came up with the idea of Healthy Start vouchers. These replaced an already existing Welfare Food Scheme https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/15159/1/Machell, Georgia (redacted).pdf
So whose responsibility is fact checking? Author? Editor? Publisher? And if published and discredited? What happens then?She has not "assembled 100 case studies". She has printed off people's accounts of their interaction with DWP. Case studies presumes some effort on her part in collating the information, and ensuring that it is a truthful. What exactly has she done to investigate the legitimacy of these allegations? She has done nothing to ensure that they cannot be disproved making her look foolish. She has not fact checked them, she has accepted them at face value. That is fine for a Twitter rant, but if she is to make allegations in the form of a book, she had better make sure they stack up to investigation.
Having been in the position of claiming benefits for the past few years, I know there are harrowing tales that deserved to be told. But this is not the way to do it. 40 days to gather information and write a book about something so complex just shows how naive she is. 40 days to research a subject as complicated as the benefits system highlights how ignorant she is on the subject.
What she has done is gather together a number of stories, sent to her at her request on Twitter, and put them in a folder.
Well whoop de do.
Oi!!! I take exception to thatShe's forgotten to add Bellend.
Please, for the love of God, stop.
We could do a collaboration. Each take a year or something. I bet we could get her too publish it.I'm quite tempted to write some poverty faction and see if she publishes it
It always reminds me of Frank Spencer (Some Mother’s do ‘ave them) who used to say “I did a Whoopsie” (unless my mind is playing mad tricks on me!)that “I did a...” thing that she always does, is she trying to be quirky or funny? It’s neither.
How many times Jack? No one cares about your second hand amger The party has started and no one is going to ask you to dance. You can can dance Iike no one is watching. because no one is.
You’re my favourite bellend!Oi!!! I take exception to that![]()
Reminds me of Ron Burgundy: “It works 60% of the time...Every time.”72% of statistics are made up on the spot.