Indeed they are not. They're lump sums that are paid every six months, usually. Along with your ALCS and PLR payments.yes but they're not dripfeed royalties, that slowly, painfully, languidly, LAGGARDLY, sluggishly ooze into their accounts
ANd they'd still be tastier than a veg peel fritter.Indeed they are not. They're lump sums that are paid every six months, usually. Along with your ALCS and PLR payments.
However, if you got an.advance you'll only get royalties if your book sells enough to cover that cost. I expect she's only getting a relatively small amount from her back catalogue at this point - if Grifty Kitchen has earned out, I'll eat my brogues.
Oh the only thing herWow the brazen neck of her whining about ‘dripfeed royalties’ when she gets ££££’s EVERY FUCKING MONTH for doing ABSOLUTELY FUCK ALL through Patreon
Can’t someone please, PLEASE from the
Comments Club pull her up on this, I beg
FFS
This is so good
Agh. So annoying.Oh the only thing herComments Club (though it looks suspiciously like a sock to me) will say is that her Patreon is “inactive” - which they later say means people are happy to pay for nothing, so that’s just fine.
It’s a way to control the narrative, keeping the focus on tomatoes and voluntary payments for no rewards instead of showing the sheer scale, complexity and depth of the grift. If you’re just peering through the keyhole, you’re not looking at the whole room.
Hopkins there making a compelling case for the enemy of my enemy is also my enemy. Glad she’s getting a dig in though, vile as she is.
I seriously think we need some kind of infographic so that people can see at a glance the scale of the grift over time. Maybe John burn Murdoch from the FT can put something together.Oh the only thing herComments Club (though it looks suspiciously like a sock to me) will say is that her Patreon is “inactive” - which they later say means people are happy to pay for nothing, so that’s just fine.
It’s a way to control the narrative, keeping the focus on tomatoes and voluntary payments for no rewards instead of showing the sheer scale, complexity and depth of the grift. If you’re just peering through the keyhole, you’re not looking at the whole room.
Let's not forget that Hopkins is a nasty piece of work.
Not been her decade so far tenderstem xNot been her day, has it?
And @tiblisipeach guyHow ambiguous ...she doesn't say she's actually delivering the food, she's delivering the message about the food. Wot a fanny. I want to see a pic of her actually holding a crate of provisions. And today's newspaper.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?