I agree. I've said before that this is almost certainly why she hasn't moved from Southend.Ive said so many times and I stand by it - I think SB is with his Dad more than her. She has shown she is manic and unstable, not a chance can she be the primary carer. (Just my opinion and speculation jackie)
Moving in with Louisa makes more sense than Louisa moving in with her. Between them they would have been paying rent and mortgage. Why not move into the owned property and save over a grand a month in rent?
When the Edinburgh debacle happened she replied to some tweets that she couldn't move there because she couldn't make SB leave his dad. That doesn't make sense. Plenty of people don't live local to their co-parent, you just have to do a bit more planning and spend a bit on travel.
If she had majority custody she could legitimately move to a 'better' area if her child would benefit. His opportunities are better in Edinburgh or a trendy part of London (nothing personal Southend but by Jack's own admission she hates living there!!!) and Jack has said she would have a better standard of life in Edinburgh.
She says its because she has to be near the dad, implying she's doing the decent thing by sacrificing her own happiness so her kid can see his dad.
Personally I think it is the other way round. Dad (stable, happy, 2 parent home, possibly with siblings. Regularly fed properly, doesn't have to buy his own sausages, not CONTINUALLY referred to on SM and can read whatever books he wants to) has full/majority custody and is resident parent. She has to stay near otherwise she wouldn't get to see the kid.
Just an opinion m'lud