This may change though on the next visit from the next case. I think others may come forward to sue if/when the papers reach a wider audience with this story. Imho.MH is the bailiffs issue if she makes them aware of it. There is legislation around them visiting vulnerable people and for a £400 debt and someone in the public eye they’re unlikely to want to risk having their license taken for not complying with it.
At the moment it’s not a big enough debt for high court enforcement, the ones who’ll visit her won’t have anywhere near that level of power.
If is doing a lot of lifting.MH is the bailiffs issue if she makes them aware of it. There is legislation around them visiting vulnerable people and for a £400 debt and someone in the public eye they’re unlikely to want to risk having their license taken for not complying with it.
At the moment it’s not a big enough debt for high court enforcement, the ones who’ll visit her won’t have anywhere near that level of power.
They are not. The only times you see open comments is when she's replying to somebody else's tweet, there's nothing she can do there.Why are her Hellsite posts open this last few days, instead of being limited just to the Comments Club, out of interest?
She owes it, but when she inevitably calls the bailiffs and says she’s willing to pay but she needs to work out how and starts citing her bad mentals, that will be enough to stop a visit in its tracks especially when she gives it large on the “I live alone with my young son” (As she’s vulnerable they are not allowed in her house if she’s alone or just with SB).If is doing a lot of lifting.
She owes the ccj ?
OH offered to help with some May/June decluttering.Yeah I think June 2022 too. I think it was after her pretend visit to the bank for a dry run of a mortgage application. And when she was wanging on about how evil her landlordlady was, how the bungamansion was AWFUL and she was TRAPPED in a rental contract but at the same time would buy it in a heartbeat for 500k as it was the homiest home that ever was and was on some weird 'rolling contract' or some such auld guff.
Probably, but the debt is still rising. As I said before my mate will pop to there and back for 80 quid to drop off a letter. Pay people jackShe owes it, but when she inevitably calls the bailiffs and says she’s willing to pay but she needs to work out how and starts citing her bad mentals, that will be enough to stop a visit in its tracks especially when she gives it large on the “I live alone with my young son” (As she’s vulnerable they are not allowed in her house if she’s alone or just with SB).
Alternatively she’ll say she’s contesting it and that will be enough to put a visit on hold.
I think she will realistically have to finally cough up and pay it via the bailiffs but unless she’s really stupid CCJ has basically warned her to look out for the letter and helped her avoid a chargeable visit. She’ll ring, arrange payment over the phone and job done.
And the debt is now over £700Probably, but the debt is still rising. As I said before my mate will pop to there and back for 80 quid to drop off a letter. Pay people jack
The most they’re allowed to charge for a letter at Jack’s level is £75, so I hope he’s not charging £80.Probably, but the debt is still rising. As I said before my mate will pop to there and back for 80 quid to drop off a letter. Pay people jack
Tbf, she listed a few items on vinted ( I think ) but possibly got them removed because she described an item as new with tags, but also worn . One was a monsoon dress I think .
Hey, I'm just remembered what he said , I'd raise it to 80 for jack tho.The most they’re allowed to charge for a letter at Jack’s level is £75, so I hope he’s not charging £80.
She’ll probably end up with one £75 but that won’t get her over the £600 mark where CCJ could get high court enforcement which is what I presume he wants.
We never know though, she might be that stupid even though she has a load of outs.
Oh, yes, you are correct!Tbf, she listed a few items on vinted ( I think ) but possibly got them removed because she described an item as new with tags, but also worn . One was a monsoon dress I think .
Or was that another decluttering ?
Not defending him cos I know eff all about him except what the papers say (and who trusts them any more? Actually, who ever did? 'Never trust what you read in the press' was drummed into some of us ancient folk! ), but he is another one who totally believes they are right. Like many of the skimping squigs fawning all over guest and her wig at the mo. And us.In the interest of balance can I be pointed at a right winger that does fuck all for the cause but earns a load of money by begging?
I'm feeling I've been harsh on Yaxley, at least everyone knows he's a grifting narc racist and he puts time in ( narc tho, who knows , narcs don't really give a fuck)
Jack you are tommy robbinson without the effort
He's an author
Declutter it?I was going to do a decluttering timeline starting in 2021 but it's TOO FUCKING LONG
Now she has locked down, hard to see anything. But iirc her last tweet was the lunacy about mackerel pate. Was that open to all comments? On unofficialbird/nitter, there was no sign it was only to comments Club as normally shows... Or so I thought.They are not. The only times you see open comments is when she's replying to somebody else's tweet, there's nothing she can do there.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?