Absolutely x
She saw the photograph of herself nearly naked and fell in love with herself all over again. She was so sure that they'd set up a pin-up/sex siren type photoshoot befitting a premier bombshell such as herself and that was all she could focus on.
It comes as no shock that the coked up bleep is now saying that she's misrepresented because she knows that this one isn't going away. She has her own words from that article tweeted at her every time she rears her stupid looking head on there and it's really not ambiguous at all: she says it. She says that she spent donations on tit she didn't want. Shattenstone can do damage limitation all he likes but he stitched her up whether intentionally or otherwise. If Shattenstone really had misrepresented her, then his words carry much more weight and have done far more in terms of reputational damage than anything those ridiculous goons Anderson and Daubney alluded to. So by rights, if she's going to sue the dastardly duo for damage to reputation, she needs to add Shattenstone to the legal case.
Over to you, Shattenstone, because she is damaging your professional reputation yo save her own arse. I think you should sue her, pal.
.
I have sawn a head in half. I say I, it was a team effort as it was extremely hard work and took the best part of an hour . If I were to try it now my slightly dicky shoulder would complain for weeks. It did not improve my knowledge of neuroanatomy in the slightest but I have a grudging respect for Hannibal Lecters work ethic
