Jack Monroe #476 Avec Dangereux Dave and Les Pantalons of Beaucoup Grandes Humiliations

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
This (see screenshots) is from the website of Brett Wilson, a law firm that specialises in libel.

Some interesting points about Twitter libel. They say:

- “Avoid the temptation to respond directly to the tweeter, retaliate or engage in a spat. You may make matters worse, undermine any claim you have or, worse still, commit a more serious libel.” Ahem.

- It is relevant if the alleged libel was re-tweeted. Jack herself and many of her followers did this, while crowing about how the libel case would buy Jack a house. No court in the land would think this looks good.

- The court may question whether there has been any serious reputational harm (which you have to show to assert libel) if you don’t “act quickly” in seeking to vindicate your reputation. In other words: if Jack wants to assert Lee Anderson has libelled her (and it’s highly doubtful this argument would succeed anyway), she has left it a long time to sue. Why? The court will look at this, she will need to explain it, and the court could well conclude that in reality she wasn’t seriously bothered about any damage to her reputation.

Some food for thought, Jack.

View attachment 1952618View attachment 1952619
Jack has absolutely no leg to stand on in terms of a libel case. Her goading of her followers re the "flying monkeys" tweet is so damming no judge worth their salt would entertain her. She's the architect of her own pathetic downfall; no trying to resurrect the "glory" of her KH win will help her now.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 60
Is she trying to bait the Express into writing an article about her and the libel accusations? Because all that would do is expose the chaos to a wider audience and draw more ridicule. Like the Mail, the Express love picking at anything that looks like lefty hypocrisy. Please Jack, I know you think we are all rotten meanies but for your own good, drop it.

Also, the 'Comma that Caused a Libel' reminds me of the 'Man Hanged by a Comma'

 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 33
It's interesting she doesn't consider herself wealthy when her monthly expenses alone (£3300 pm/£39,600 pa) are more than the entire average full time uk salary (£38,131 as of October 2022) BEFORE tax. Ok it's not Gary Lineker wealth but she really needs to stop this silly line of argument as it's just tying her up in knots and drawing even more attention to her finances
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sad
Reactions: 85
View attachment 1952567

It has come to my attention through this squig that there are also 'get up and go muffins' (recipe on Pan Macmillan website through link) ... which contain ... 10 points if you guess it ... PRUNES!!!!!.

What happens if you enjoy them accompanied by the get up and go smoothie? Do you tit yourself into another dimension?
Another recipe containing banana skins; I’m still traumatised from making banana pancakes as part of the Slopathon 🤢
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Sad
Reactions: 32
Another recipe containing banana skins; I’m still traumatised from making banana pancakes as part of the Slopathon 🤢
Aren’t you supposed to be careful when using banana skins in cooking too? Possible exposure to pesticides etc. I’ve seen recipes where they caution you to scrub the skins before cooking for this reason. Not that Jack would have a clue.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 35
Ffs - she really is an absolutely honking imbecile. Reading through that Twitter libel info, having a mini-aneurysm at the sheer scale of her audacious stupidity and self-absorption. LibelJack seems to think people on the hellsite calling her a grifting buffoon is like some kind combination swear jar/pension fund into which assorted squigs are paying, and that one day all she has to do is lawyer up, click her fingers, and cash it all in.

Anyone else ever try to imagine what it would be like to live inside Jack's head? Between truly believing any and all criticism is tantamount to libel/STOPPING ME FROM BREATHING and relating absolutely every single reference to anything back to yourself so you can tell everyone how you do it, like it, know it only better, funnier and more Jackishly than anyone else in the history of everything...And then the lies, the distortions and exagerrations...Just so exhausting. No wonder she's such a sarky bleep whenever she's not telling her neckbeards about how she fell off a Chesterfield while listening to Coldplay in a pub only to have seemed like such an amazing smol pixie that everyone around her instantly fell in love and showered her in sideboards.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 44
And I’m 99.364% sure she’s said recently that the KH sofa was the first new one she’s ever owned.
Sofas are a pretty common second hand item so while I agree it’s her handwriting, I don’t think it’s proof it was brand new (or that it’s unusual for people to have never owned a new sofa in general, though she certainly seems to think it is).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 33
She told Edwina in her open letter in 2014 that it was “almost a year” before she was referred to a food bank.
View attachment 1952482View attachment 1952483

But by Hattenstone in Jan 2023 it was “before long/about 4-5 weeks” and that she “plucked up the courage to go” no referral mentioned.
View attachment 1952485
View attachment 1952484
And her parents found out about THE POV after her sale in August 2012 and brought food round
View attachment 1952487
So where does the “about a year” from leaving her job in Nov 2011 before she was referred to a food bank fit into the rest of this bullshit fictional nonsense?

Oh! It fits in here! “Six months ago” from June 2013 she told the House of Commons. Literally, this is from her HOC testimony. So December 2012, apparently. And you need a referral again.

Months and months after her parents came over with bags of food in August 2012, and a full year after the lie she told Hattenstone in this year’s Guardian article.
View attachment 1952505View attachment 1952507View attachment 1952512
That June 2013 article is a load of utter bilge. She lied that she was ok despite her son being 'an absolute state'? A food bank queue '60 deep of other mothers with pushchairs and small starving children'? And I see the food bank people were at again - 5 tins of beans. Complete shite.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 54
Re: the Katie whatsherface blog, undoubtedly she got some stuff wrong but overall I felt there were some interesting observations made. Not joining the fan club any time soon mind, but I like people agreeing with us!
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 38
I'm on holiday and in an hour of so won't have much WiFi for a week, how dare she chaos now!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 35
Sofas are a pretty common second hand item so while I agree it’s her handwriting, I don’t think it’s proof it was brand new (or that it’s unusual for people to have never owned a new sofa in general, though she certainly seems to think it is).
Yes, could be secondhand, it looks in great condition, far from the dragged out of a skip she‘d like us to believe. And I bet it cost more than she got selling the old one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 32
It's interesting she doesn't consider herself wealthy when her monthly expenses alone (£3300 pm/£39,600 pa) are more than the entire average full time uk salary (£38,131 as of October 2022) BEFORE tax. Ok it's not Gary Lineker wealth but she really needs to stop this silly line of argument as it's just tying her up in knots and drawing even more attention to her finances
Jack has always obfuscated her finances. The amount she's managed to spaff on expensive material shite attests to that. She's financed her entire life through lying. Hunger Hurts 2 was a total lie and she deserves to be vilified for that.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 51
It's interesting she doesn't consider herself wealthy when her monthly expenses alone (£3300 pm/£39,600 pa) are more than the entire average full time uk salary (£38,131 as of October 2022) BEFORE tax. Ok it's not Gary Lineker wealth but she really needs to stop this silly line of argument as it's just tying her up in knots and drawing even more attention to her finances
This had me 🦉ing again because it reminded me of her thanking Lineker in Grifty Smidgen. Because of 1 tweet :D
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 44
Sofas are a pretty common second hand item so while I agree it’s her handwriting, I don’t think it’s proof it was brand new (or that it’s unusual for people to have never owned a new sofa in general, though she certainly seems to think it is).
Yep. I’ve only ever owned one new sofa (and that was because of an insurance claim). I’d rather buy good quality 2nd hand.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 26
That June 2013 article is a load of utter bilge. She lied that she was ok despite her son being 'an absolute state'? A food bank queue '60 deep of other mothers with pushchairs and small starving children'? And I see the food bank people were at again - 5 tins of beans. Complete shite.
Perhaps Jack has access to some sort of “Goodnight sweetheart” portal to the past, as she seems to have stumbled upon a Dickensian workhouse in her various retellings of the pov. Surprised we’ve not heard about SB being recruited as a pick pocket or taking on weekend work as a chimney sweep yet.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 54
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.