Evening mon frereâs et soeurâs, I havenât been on here since a week ago due to a new job so I havenât been in the loop or upto speed with all of your important contributions posted over the last couple of threads and no disrespect to any of you my fellow brethren but I have a Chinese takeaway en route and I have absolutely no chance of catching up and reading a weekâs worth of all of your posts during this weekend, so I am just going to offer my apologies for skipping ahead and hope that you will accept my most sincerest of apologies.
Over the course of the last week I have seen a few âpostsâ made by people on the blue bird hell site where they have mentioned taking the MCOL route in regards to their Patreon subscription not being honoured as per the contractual agreement and the coke head not adhering to their contractual obligations, using MCOL as an avenue to seek reimbursement of the total monetary value of their subscription payments.
The 3/4 people who have mentioned this are Patreon subscribers who have requested a refund but instead they have been ignored and blocked by our bottle and a half of whiskey a day drinking degenerative friend.
You see, because of this my thoughts are immediately drawn to the potential of a chaos within a chaos that will be the biggest chaos of all possible chaosâs that we could end up with the last ever, ever Monroe thread which would be titled âThe Chaos to end all Chaosâ (Okay it wouldnât be the last ever thread but it would be the biggest ever chaos, chaosâs!
) âŚSo my thoughts are has anyone else given any real thoughts to doing this and actually making a MCOL claim for the amount that they are outstanding for their Patreon? There must be a fellow fraus prepared to take one for the team and I would be more than happy to give you legal advice with regards to this.
that is for someone who has been a Patreon supporter/subscriber for a reasonable period of time who would like their money refunded. You would 100% legally win your claim getting a judgment handed down with regards to this. You would win due to one of 3 possible outcomes, either;
1) Monroe does not respond to your claim at all or she doesnât respond within the allotted time period for her to file a defence and therefore you will win by what is called a default judgment and she would be required to pay you for your original claim amount, plus 8% per annum interest on that amount as well as your court costs for lodging your claim. âŚ.or
2) Monroe does in fact file a defence with regards to the particulars of your claim with a view to contesting your claim BUT by virtue of the facts available which you can substantiate that she didnât fulfil her end of the Patreon contract and the same exact thing that she didnât fulfil her obligations under this contract then again you would win and have a judgment handed down that your claim was successful and she would be required to pay you for your original claim amount, plus 8% per annum interest on that amount as well as your court costs for lodging your claim..or
3) She responds to your claim with a response of acknowledging the particulars of your claim and that she doesnât have any defence to it and that she is liable for the amount and any other associated costsâŚthis will result in you winning your claim and having a judgment handed down and again she would be required to pay you for your original claim amount, plus 8% per annum interest on that amount as well as your court costs for lodging your claim.
just as an important addendum to what I have said above that she doesnât have a defence at all as the facts of her not conforming to her Patreon contract with you nor her contractual obligations and that you (in fact we all do) have evidence of this and her not doing so, the absolute KILLER piece of evidence that further backs this up is MonroeâsVERY OWN WORDS in the widely published Grauniad article where she was interviewed for her Grauniad feature which in her interview she acknowledged that she had NOT met her Patreon contract requirements nor her Patreon contractual obligations, stating that she hadnât done so for a period of 19 months I believe that I recall her saying in that Grauniad interview although the facts and reality is that it was far longer than that of a minimum of 24 months (2 years) This article itself is what will overall get you a successful judgment.
okay you may ask..how is doing that going to bring the chaos within a chaos and the chaosâs of all chaosâs?? WELL for those fraus who are not well versed in law, civil law in particular and matters of the financial persuasionâŚ..Well her losing such a civil claim which she would for the reasons I have outlined above, well this means that when the judgment is handed down, this is more officially and commonly known as a CCJâŚa County Court JudgmentâŚ. Now what does having a CCJ affect and impact? It affects and impacts getting any kind of or type of financial creditâŚ.WHATS THE ONE THING THAT A CCJ IMPACTS MOST??? That would be getting a mortgage offer in principle from any UK lender. LITERALLY no mortgage lenders on the lending panels will ever, ever touch a mortgage application from a person if they have a CCJ, regardless of the amount of the CCJ owing, even if the CCJ is for just a ÂŁ1. They donât even entertain mortgage applications from those who have settled their CCJs until a significant amount of time has passed like a year or two.
so my thoughts are why doesnât someone who has been a subscriber make a MCOL claim? This would prevent her from getting any kind of mortgage of any value (even if she is putting in a massive lump sum) it would also impact when being screened for rental purposes but I believe like most that she is currently buying. If she is paying for aproperty as a full cash buyer then yes it would have no real impact however I would be inclined to place a charge against her property with the CCJ but also having a CCJ judgment against her for her Patreon I would be publicly publishing that on social media to expose her, yes she may try and twist it by saying âyeah I am Jack Monroe and I have a CCJ against me because thatâs what happens when you are in poverty, people get CCJsâ but that wonât work because it would be a CCJ not because she was in poverty but because she defrauded people
thoughts?
about Jack's cynical weaponising of trans issues is that it draws close to zero of any kind of supportive response. Almost any account on Twitter just has to say "X person/people said/did something transphobic" and a there will be some kind of response.
on my best behaviour for court