dresser man is now following him. I wonder what piqued his interestI’m not getting excited about this because unless he has access to Jack’s actual PayPal and bank account details, its literally going to be a rehash to what we already know.
I hope he can get more from this, but I’m not holding my breath.
I don't know what you mean, Jack has told us herself that she can't lie. It's us that twist her words. It's us that misrepresents her. It's us that jump to conclusions. It's us that exaggerate to make her look bad. It's us that don't understand the value of her campaigning. It's us that pick on her even though all she wants to do is help people.Fraus, you did it! Colombo/ Magnum PI of the SistahSpace deep dive has Jackie in his sights. Starting Monday!!!! The week when we get Guardian.pdf ANDGriftyThrifty Kitchen! Deservedly, I present this gif to sum up the forthcoming chaos….
https://giphy.com/P7JmDW7IkB7TW
Mr Dressaman (DRESSA) was also one of the first to 'like' TD's post yesterday, so he's still (quietly, gently) on the case, it seems. I'm genuinely astounded that after the preview, the book launch still seems to be going ahead? Though I doubt very much that the TT will have anything to do with it at this stage, which is why it's been very quiet on the 'donated copies' and free kindle (or w/e) version front. I can only hope that whoever's written the big spread Guardian piece actually read the book beforehand. Because they're ultimately going to be a laughing stock if they just repeat the usual hagiography.dresser man is now following him. I wonder what piqued his interest
I think it will end up being a rehash of the AM posts but hopefully without the cloutchasing those seemed to descend into and a better focus on the big things.I’m not getting excited about this because unless he has access to Jack’s actual PayPal and bank account details, its literally going to be a rehash to what we already know.
I hope he can get more from this, but I’m not holding my breath.
I don’t really agree with this. TD is a successful writer, and she’s had an issue with Jack longer than probably all of us on here. Her annoyance at Jack is clearly genuine and I think she wants to make the point regardless of what the FMs or whoever else thinks, and isn’t interested in the drama.I know the seeming excuse for it before was the fear of the flying monkeys, but there have been so many consistent jags at Jack that I don’t think the “I didn’t use her name” five year old level argument would stop them. She knows as well as we do that what stops them is the fact she’s right.
It’s frustrating because everything she says is a good point, bizarre highlighting of ableist over incredibly dangerous aside, and I think she’s actually the kind of person some of the squigs might truly listen to but the way it’s presented as sly subtweets (sometimes clearly aimed at here) completely undermines it - and if Jack was to try hold her up as an example of bullying, the digs and indirectness would play in Jack’s favour IMO.
Thread title.You know, as nice as it would be to see her truly get her comeuppance from the grift, I think it would really be fitting if people pick up on how dangerous some of these tips are and this is what ends it all.
She’d still have an outlet of blaming others, but instead of the trolls she’d have to turn on her agent, publisher, editor… all the people the book got past, it would really highlight how the issue goes deeper than just Southend’s Pinocchio-In-Chief.
ETA: also the knife thing is particularly nonsensical to me because when I helped at a food bank one of the first things they’d ask a user was if they had a tin opener and if they said no… we would give them one as part of the package! Because yes, inevitably a lot was cans, some don’t have ring pulls and ring pulls can break anyway. Are the TT not doing this because it seems pretty basic?
Added to that:As others have said, I think the problem with any investigation is that there are few avenues left that the FORENSIC members of the Canal haven't explored. Her company was wound up without publishing accounts, her patreon income isn't public, nor is her PayPal - for me, the biggest financial issue is the suing 30p Lee PayPal rattle, which was not ringfenced in any way. The proper fundraisers via gofundme go directly to the charities so no impropriety there. He might have access to a few databases or sources we don't, but given she's a private individual and the fuckery around winding up her Ltd company, I'd be interested to see what he can manage to find beyond all the usual contradictions and lies.
Three things I would really like to know:
What is her Patreon income?
How much did she make from the I'm suing Lee tip jar rattle, and has she initiated proceedings?
What was the total sales figures/income and profit for the Teemill store?
In fairness I could not possibly know that two hours after I wrote that, TD would decide to reply to someone saying Jack’s name directly. Fair play to her for it.I don’t really agree with this. TD is a successful writer, and she’s had an issue with Jack longer than probably all of us on here. Her annoyance at Jack is clearly genuine and I think she wants to make the point regardless of what the FMs or whoever else thinks, and isn’t interested in the drama.
In this case she did actually go on to say she was talking about JM anyway.
BIB is a very interesting point. Plenty of people out in the real world are questioning TT and their operations/finances. I wonder if they'll throw Jack under the bus to protect themselves......Added to that:
How much money did she make from this whole confusing spiel of her, Trussell Trust, bookstore etc all saying ‘buy one and we‘ll donate another copy to a foodbank.
Once he’s done with Jack, I hope he moves onto the TT.
I don’t really accept this, if you don’t mind me saying. SB could walk into the squigs houses, punch them in the Fanny and shit on their dinner plates and they’d say he’s been warped by what he’s read online and probably think he’s a Brexiter.I think it will end up being a rehash of the AM posts but hopefully without the cloutchasing those seemed to descend into and a better focus on the big things.
The issue I think will be some of his previous tweets meaning the squigs might dismiss him as just another guy with an agenda. I don’t think there’s anything about Jack in his history, but there was enough generally that I saw people on the hellsite refusing to entertain his points about sistahspace - unless he’s done a Jack and deleted them all by now.
One thing in Jack's favour regarding #worldearthday, at least she didn't think it meant posting a photo of all the places you've travelled to on Earth like Katie Hayes did. Lmao, that woman is WILDLY dumb.I had a quick trawl through her Twitter this morning to see if she’s ever mentioned the environment or fracking. Nope. Although all her tweets pre 2017 are gone as we know (and lots after).
the only time it comes up is people mentioning environmental concerns when she’s wanging on about cheap food/fuel. Obviously she ignores them.
What I did find interesting was the paid collab she did with Twitter this year
View attachment 1839763
wasn’t as successful as it might have been because she kept turning comments off and lost interest after a couple of days so there were some sad people who wanted to join in but couldn’t. This is where the banana peel pancake recipe is from. Wonder how much else is going to be recycled in Grifty Kitchen? I wonder how much she was paid?
Oh I completely agree it’s not valid to dismiss him and also the squigs would find any excuse, just that in this case they’ve got something already lined up to do it with. So it might not be that explosive given both that and that it seems unlikely he’ll find out much that hasn’t already been covered.I don’t really accept this, if you don’t mind me saying. SB could walk into the squigs houses, punch them in the Fanny and shit on their dinner plates and they’d say he’s been warped by what he’s read online and probably think he’s a Brexiter.
Nah serves them right if they’ve not done their due diligence. Should be a career ending piece if they’ve succumbed to the Jack storyI can only hope that whoever's written the big spread Guardian piece actually read the book beforehand. Because they're ultimately going to be a laughing stock if they just repeat the usual hagiography.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?