I'll be honest and admit that I've only really looked at the Jack Tweets and not gone that far back in their timeline.See. I'm not convinced that account is her. Obviously the name and stuff isn't real but welcome to Twitter, however looking back over their tweets they don't seem to share many Jack interest beyond boilerplate Tories bad. This appears to be the first time they've shown any interest and from what I can see from their infrequent tweeting they seem be desperate for a Twitter argument. Going for an anti-Jack account seems as good a way as any to get a reaction and to me it looks like more what they're interested in that Jack herself. Also the more obvious Jack socks tend to delete and reappear whereas this once seem fairly constant. As ever, it's Twitter so I don't know who it is but I'm not convinced it's Jack.
And they say Tattle has no redeeming social value. Really though, it's a constant source of edification and enlightenment. She still got chilled wrong and I will go to them mat over that. And she has stuffed another pair of expensive earrings into her one hole. Tiffany's "cheap" line at $575 per pair. For those label conscious types.Because I didn't see it before the last thread closed - @Snotbuster, fear not dear heart, for once Jack is not bogarting y'all's lingo with her use of scoff:
You see this is why I don't comment very often, I get sucked into the Jackspiracies and my suspicious mind goes OFF.See. I'm not convinced that account is her. Obviously the name and stuff isn't real but welcome to Twitter, however looking back over their tweets they don't seem to share many Jack interest beyond boilerplate Tories bad. This appears to be the first time they've shown any interest and from what I can see from their infrequent tweeting they seem be desperate for a Twitter argument. Going for an anti-Jack account seems as good a way as any to get a reaction and to me it looks like more what they're interested in that Jack herself. Also the more obvious Jack socks tend to delete and reappear whereas this once seem fairly constant. As ever, it's Twitter so I don't know who it is but I'm not convinced it's Jack.
In the thread bragging about how OH bought her the Tiffany earrings, didn't she say the other pair was chosen because laurels are traditional for Greek people? She's just being true to her heritage as a third-generation immigrantAnd they say Tattle has no redeeming social value. Really though, it's a constant source of edification and enlightenment. She still got chilled wrong and I will go to them mat over that. And she has stuffed another pair of expensive earrings into her one hole. Tiffany's "cheap" line at $575 per pair. For those label conscious types.
So sorry to hear that, how awful. Hugs to you and your friend xxI am absolutely furious at the at the strep-A baiting. I came running here from not quite the end of the last thread. I know somebody whoFUCK OFF JACKjust lost their CHILD to the iGAS, their baby is one of the deaths counted on the news
This reminds me, Jack's mum bought Jack an official caterpillar cake last year. But SB whose birthday is only a few days later got a knock off version. What I can't remember is if Jack bought it or not. She buys premium brand food for herself but smart price for her son. Every other parent I know would do it the other way around. Your child gets the very best you can afford.Because she's a shit mum.
My mum made me one when I was about 23Or made him one being the crafty crafter she is?
You've not made a tit of yourself at all. Taken in isolation that thread where they're arguing with the anti- Jack account does contain some Jackish tendencies, particularly the condescending arrogance she sometimes adopts. As I say it's Twitter we don't really know who anyone is, even with big name blue tick accounts, it could be an assistant running the account rather than the celeb. Whilst we do like a good receipt here, a lot of the chat is speculation so don't feel you have to lurk for joining in.You see this is why I don't comment very often, I get sucked into the Jackspiracies and my suspicious mind goes OFF.
I'll resume my lurking position and reading the excellent work you all do from the safety of my phone, which doesn't have my login details so I can only read and not make a tit of myself.
(AGAIN, JACK: SEE HOW EASY THAT IS?)
A bit early but has to be a contendershe’s had more breakdowns than the RAC
Could combine both: "More breakdowns than Big Ben and the RAC put together"A bit earlier has to be a contender
I know someone whose parents would eat a steak dinner and give their (not a small) child fish fingers. He was still pissed off about it.This reminds me, Jack's mum bought Jack an official caterpillar cake last year. But SB whose birthday is only a few days later got a knock off version. What I can't remember is if Jack bought it or not. She buys premium brand food for herself but smart price for her son. Every other parent I know would do it the other way around. Your child gets the very best you can afford.
https://giphy.com/QAsHga1AB6dIGUsui6Any clues, please?
Mine still has the stone shelf thingYup, we’ve a pantry just like that now, stuffed to the gills. I grew up with a mum and nanna in council houses which also had under-stair pantries in the kitchen. Mine is missing a nice stone shelf, but I get by *sniff*.
Ahem, my kids do and they’re in their 20’s.I don't even understand why someone would get an advent calendar for their 34 year old daughter??
Stone shelf! Such luxury! We had to nail our Frey Bentos pies directly to the wall!Yup, we’ve a pantry just like that now, stuffed to the gills. I grew up with a mum and nanna in council houses which also had under-stair pantries in the kitchen. Mine is missing a nice stone shelf, but I get by *sniff*.
Laurals are traditional for Roman emperors...In the thread bragging about how OH bought her the Tiffany earrings, didn't she say the other pair was chosen because laurels are traditional for Greek people? She's just being true to her heritage as a third-generation immigrant
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?