When the Street Reads thing came up back in June, @Cack Conroe noticed that they were actually appealing for money rather than direct donations of books - see https://tattle.life/threads/jack-monroe-319-belle-du-poor.30562/page-3#post-10098111
Sorry to quote again. But the Potatoes drawing is not Jack's work.
So I didn’t know she grifted/is still grifting cash for a THIRD different book to be ‘donated!!! And again, give me your cash and I’ll provide zero transparency.
That's a really good point - and underlines just how much money she's refusing to account for. It's not a few quid here or there, it's many tens or hundreds of thousands of pounds.
If that is correct, then even by Jack’s standards, my mind is (not)LITERALLY BLOWN that in 2022 she is still grifting cash for a charity that ceased operating in 2016.
Do you think anyone's investigating this? Any chance it's part of what Molly's referring to?
Just... How? How can she say 'use what you want from my blog'? She didn't have to sign anything? The researchers didn't contact her multiple times to verify stories or seek third party verification? Did she get any payment or does she get royalties?Actually, she very, very heavily implied that it was, in a separate Guardian article a month before she punched the Odeon wall and ran out howling into the night. They contacted her for ‘research’ and she then goes on about how it’s basically ‘her’ story
View attachment 1637623
I, Daniel Blake: Ken Loach and the scandal of Britain’s benefits system
The veteran director’s latest movie lays bare the cruel realities for those who fall through the cracks of society. We look at Loach’s work and the politics that drive it, while, below, campaigners, artists and analysts react to the filmwww.theguardian.com
I bloody hope so.
It depends whether anyone knows about it. I mean, we are pretty FORENSIC on here, and I’ve been around both lurking and then posting for a good while and it’s the first time I’ve realized/learned about this- and that she’s also grifting for a defunct charity.
Maybe those researchers are to doing their due diligence exactly what the Guardian and everyone else who’s given her a platform are re: Jack’s pov ‘story’
One of those articles:
www.greenbelt.org.uk
I knew it!!!Actually, she very, very heavily implied that it was, in a separate Guardian article a month before she punched the Odeon wall and ran out howling into the night. They contacted her for ‘research’ and she then goes on about how it’s basically ‘her’ story
View attachment 1637623
I, Daniel Blake: Ken Loach and the scandal of Britain’s benefits system
The veteran director’s latest movie lays bare the cruel realities for those who fall through the cracks of society. We look at Loach’s work and the politics that drive it, while, below, campaigners, artists and analysts react to the film
Well she is quiet, but she's always lurking, behind the scenes. Like a bad smell that you can't quite locate the source of.
A lingering honk you might say.
Yeah, and it’s journo ‘code’ for snidely implying that the subject of the interview might be under the influence ofOne thing I have noticed is how many interviewers/journalists comment in their articles about Jack sniffling or having a cold as in the Tîm Adams one in the post here:
https://tattle.life/threads/jack-monroe-412-chiz-on-tiz.34087/post-12096307
Really makes you think
. It used to crop up a lot in NME and Melody Maker interview features back in the 90s 
Oh no. And the person who drew it paints with her mouth. I feel rotten now. Sorry.
