Well the Loose Women themselves were pretty useless but a lot of tweets to them saw sense!
Last edited:
yeah she did keep repeating that it’s her interpretation of the book, but that’s no use? Would have made far more sense to read from the book - eg a passage where that shop keeper is being portrayed badly. It would actually illustrate the point better?!Yes I thought this. Brenda was not aware of and had never seen any of the books and was basing her opinion on the tweets of Jack's being read out by Andrea. They did make it very clear that these were Jack's words but it still didn't give a very balanced debate.
On a catch up so someone else might have pointed this out, but it's not the first time she's changed her name to Monrowflake.View attachment 174736How incredibly mature.
Oof.This, from Mumsnet, is obviously by someone who has been following Jack's antics fairly closely (one of us?) and is IMO a pretty good summation of her recent activity, for any newbies.
She really is just recycling the same old shite isn't she.On a catch up so someone else might have pointed this out, but it's not the first time she's changed her name to Monrowflake.
2017:
View attachment 174786
Wife? She must've forgotten to invite me to the wedding.
This, from Mumsnet, is obviously by someone who has been following Jack's antics fairly closely (one of us?) and is IMO a pretty good summation of her recent activity, for any newbies.
Being cynical here, is it even true?Treatment at the Priory doesn't come cheap. Wonder how she managed to afford that?
She's definitely going for Martyrdom. Jack of Arc with her venomous bark.This, from Mumsnet, is obviously by someone who has been following Jack's antics fairly closely (one of us?) and is IMO a pretty good summation of her recent activity, for any newbies.
Yes it's pretty much the usual for LW. They always just scratch the surface and don't properly debate anything or give it enough time. Unless it's to highlight the woes of one of the panel members of course, then they'll dedicate a whole programme to it.yeah she did keep repeating that it’s her interpretation of the book, but that’s no use? Would have made far more sense to read from the book - eg a passage where that shop keeper is being portrayed badly. It would actually illustrate the point better?!
I haven’t watched loose women before is this what it’s always like? It’s shocking if so, daytime TV watchers deserve better
Definitely Thread #42 here.She's definitely going for Martyrdom. Jack of Arc with her venomous bark.
Jack of Narc, the patron saint of blowing smoke up your own arse.She's definitely going for Martyrdom. Jack of Arc with her venomous bark.
I caught the tail.end and yes that is what she said - 'why should characters be described by how they look?' When did that become a problem?Was Brenda basically arguing at the end that books should never describe characters by their looks !!! hahaha wtf.
Thread #42 suggestion right thereJack of Narc, the patron saint of blowing smoke up your own arse.
I wonder how many were given to schools?She's such a hypocrite. When she did the Kickstarter, she asked for people to donate copies to schools....
View attachment 174628
This book, which she was asking people to donate to schools so am guessing she was aiming them at kids(??) contains the following recipe....
View attachment 174635
Which along with the delightfully child friendly title, also references anal sex??
could you imagine what she’s like to live with? I can imagine her talking down to poor SB in her awful “I know best” way whilst being horribly obtuse and defensive. We know she doesn’t take criticism or differences of opinion well.I wonder if it's the first time it's happened.
yassssss Grunka, go INNNN!She's such a hypocrite. When she did the Kickstarter, she asked for people to donate copies to schools....
View attachment 174628
This book, which she was asking people to donate to schools so am guessing she was aiming them at kids(??) contains the following recipe....
View attachment 174635
Which along with the delightfully child friendly title, also references anal sex??