Passive_Aggressive_Lemon
Well-known member
I am absolutely here for JM speaking out against abusers. I fully support her naming and shaming and helping other victims.
However, starting a discussion on sexual harassment straight after a manic twitter rant is not the right way to do it. It lacks credibility. It looks like a desperate plea for more attention and won’t be taken as seriously as it should be. It’s not a subject you fuck around with.
As for David Walliams, I don’t know anything about his books, but I do know that she just told 250k people that he’s a coke head. I wonder if there’s a precedent that’s been set in any landmark legal cases involving Twitter? Ah yes....Monroe v Hopkins
ps. Have you taken that cat to the vet yet?
However, starting a discussion on sexual harassment straight after a manic twitter rant is not the right way to do it. It lacks credibility. It looks like a desperate plea for more attention and won’t be taken as seriously as it should be. It’s not a subject you fuck around with.
As for David Walliams, I don’t know anything about his books, but I do know that she just told 250k people that he’s a coke head. I wonder if there’s a precedent that’s been set in any landmark legal cases involving Twitter? Ah yes....Monroe v Hopkins
ps. Have you taken that cat to the vet yet?
Last edited: