Minor but brilliant third act twist
Minor but brilliant third act twist
This fucks me off massively to the extent that I've been on there and outed myself pretty much as a non-TERF, non-Tory, previously living in (minor) poverty as a single parent. I'm protected on Twitter but fuck me if I'm going to have squigs suggesting that this thread is anything to do with gender - I don't think it was even mentioned in Molly's take down. The really fucking annoying thing is on an ideological standpoint I absolutely agree and support JM's views.View attachment 1465601
I mean god forbid people with different viewpoints can find common ground on a completely unrelated topic! Not once does AM mention Jack's gender status.
No wonder the left is fucked with this ridiculous groupthink.
Oh yes, I drew a surly cat saying SHAN'T to returning a squig's PayPal donationI teach (triangulate away Jack) and some of the kids saw pics of Harold and a cat I drew wearing a ‘Dead people CANT Riot’ T shirt (don’t even remember why) when I was screensharing. Also a pic of Jack wearing her gypsy rose glasses. #Awkward
I'm still holding out for IqbalMinor but brilliant third act twist
I know right, I'm sending in my letter of resignation now. I've not even been able to keep up with AE with all this.Between this enorma-chaos and it being Alice Evans' PRO date, I may have to give up work.
Please send snackos and vinos to keep me alive as I Iie on a lilo on the floor
This thread will be RTd into any announcement or media push involving Jack.I can't see how she can possibly come back from this. Brands and their agencies will now want to distance from her purely on optics - they know the risk of cross-tagging by people on social media calling Jack out and it being harmful to their own marketing platforms & campaigns. I'd also not be surprised to see her publisher drop her. Can't say I'll be sad to see either of these things happen
Well having your product endorsed by a known liar is hardly a recipe for good sales. I suppose some maverick ad genius could devise a campaign where Jack slates the product and everyone realises it's great and buys it but it doesn't seem all that likely.I can't see how she can possibly come back from this. Brands and their agencies will now want to distance from her purely on optics - they know the risk of cross-tagging by people on social media calling Jack out and it being harmful to their own marketing platforms & campaigns. I'd also not be surprised to see her publisher drop her. Can't say I'll be sad to see either of these things happen
Wasn't it when Jack had invested in/found/been gifted some 'artwork' of a cat which looked like something a small child would reject as shit? We all came up with our own offerings hoping she might shell out a lot for themOh yes, I drew a surly cat saying SHAN'T to returning a squig's PayPal donation. Why did we draw cats, I can't remember either?
Like Mr Back to Front from the Mr Men. ‘Push the boat out’ to make him pull it in.Well having your product endorsed by a known liar is hardly a recipe for good sales. I suppose some maverick ad genius could devise a campaign where Jack slates the product and everyone realises it's great and buys it but it doesn't seem all that likely.
In all the excitement I overlooked the sleekit, despicable use of "fellow abusers" here. There is nothing abusive about that thread and I've not seen anyone be abusive off the back of it. This is why, whilst I would generally take any claims of abuse at face value, I just don't believe a single claim Jack makes about abusive behaviour towards her. Receipts or it didn't happen Jack.
From the sideboard of doomA rusty spoon...
Without sounding confrontational, Hotes, I'm really not sure I agree. There are literally hundreds, if not thousands of screenshots on these threads of people calling her out. It isn't our role to moderate this forum or what other people have said on Twitter. I don't think it is unreasonable to share screenshots given the current chaos. If I'm wrong or if I've completely misunderstood your post then I'm happy to be corrected.Lads without moderating, can I remind you that in the past we have had issues when we’ve posted a lot of screenies from what appear to be Mr T Roll accounts. Whether that be pro Jack or Anti Jack. The problems that have been caused were Mr T then going after tattlers such as tracking them down on socials/IRL twitter, posting horrible tweets about tattlers using their tattle handle. It’s not that we shy away from the “maybe a troll” accounts because they have less clout, it’s because they can, and have, turned on tattle posters because...they’re really into T Rolling.
On topic, has Big Dave been around for a word with her yet or what? Hurry up, her bones are grinding to dust!
It's glorious. Some highlights below.
View attachment 1465593
View attachment 1465594
View attachment 1465596
View attachment 1465597
View attachment 1465598
View attachment 1465600
Lucky timing for her as she has just recently been painstakingly applying for jobs on her iPhone.I can't see how she can possibly come back from this. Brands and their agencies will now want to distance from her purely on optics - they know the risk of cross-tagging by people on social media calling Jack out and it being harmful to their own marketing platforms & campaigns. I'd also not be surprised to see her publisher drop her. Can't say I'll be sad to see either of these things happen
We must keep that up our sleeve for later in the thread because it's one hell of a title.Your army of clueless middle class liberals who love lentils
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?