Not surprised she hasn't got a great deal in the main account this morning, if overnight has been anything to go by.
Because somebody incadescant with fury at somebody supposedly affecting her ability to earn an income and be on the receiving end of unpleasant messages from randoms when she is but a poor, defenceless disabled pixie would NEVER highlight somebody with a Protected Characteristic (such as HIV status - automatically included under the Disabled category from the point of diagnosis) for their followers/FMs to doxx and abuse, would they? After all, that would be a reason for that person with that disability to commence court action on the grounds that it was the originator's tweet that caused harm. Somebody would NEVER do such a thing unless they had been affected by a particularly bad case of insomnia with hayfever and agitation/aggression, would they? sniff sniff
amp.theguardian.com
www.bbc.co.uk
