Crowdjustice.com. Go on. You know you want to.
I see she still does not know what pro bono means
It’s not just you. My job is pretty senior, and I’ve worked very hard to be where I am. I used to be one, and now have data analysts reporting to me, so her “in another life I’d have been a data analyst” guff irked the hell out of me.One thing that is really annoying is Jack saying "oh, I'll just go and work as <insert occupation>" all the time.
It is possible to attempt any job, but to be good at a job is very hard. We have a wide range of jobs in the canal, yet Jack seems to think any of them would be easier, less stressful, better paid than whatever she does.
It winds me up - I've worked hard over the years to be good at my job, to learn new things to be even better at it. I am constantly trying to improve instead of thinking yeah, completed it mate. I don't know if it's just me this annoys?
Jumping ahead here but I picked a great night to wake up at 3 am! @Wooh and @Cookiecookie gird your loins, lads.Is anyone else
And any judge worth their salt would certainly take a dim view of her publicly, pre-emptively gloating about the amount of damages she's hoping to get. Not to mention the bad optics of an "anti-poverty campaigner" relishing the prospect of people, however unpleasant they might be, being plunged into poverty.By behaving how she is, she's increasing the reach of the video. Could certainly be argued that she clearly was not that affected by comments in the video if she continued to ensure it gained traction.
Someone who likes U2?I see she still does know what pro bono means![]()
I've learned on the Wagatha Christie thread that the defendant actually has to prove they are right.Imagine if they get the list of Patreon peeps and they are mostly POVs.
Case closed, love. Has she forgotten that frivolous law suits like this are A) for the privileged and/or rich and B) She has to actually prove he is wrong?
And I almost find myself siding with Lozza.She’s so awful. Every time I don’t think I could dislike her any more, she makes it happen. Can’t believe she’s got me siding with Daubney! What ableep
Not only that, I think Lee Anderson could easily defend his comment about her being rich by comparing their backgrounds. However well off he is now as an MP, he wasn't born into privilege to the extent Jack was.I am cringing myself inside out. 'My' lawyer who works 'pro bono' (meaning I instructed someone once who did my case on a no win no fee). Incorrect use of libel, her narc bullying grandiose statements about how nailed on her case is she'll now have to climb down from. It's brilliant!
Her gleeful smugness over this is vom inducing though.
Go on Jack, sue him, I dare you! Remember is isn't slander/libel if it's true and we have the receipts. Focusing on the millionaire bit doesn't take away from the fact that you rake in thousands for duck all, some of whom are benefit claimants.
Also, all your finances, patreon donations, charity donations, kickstarter, your conduct on twitter including the goading you are doing right now will be dragged through the court with the focus on it all at once and it won't be pretty. But it will be fun for us!
She actually received relatively little, certainly not enough for a house, last time.Yeah no, your lawyer didn’t get a penny (I assume as Hopkins got an IVA) so I can’t see him being arsed doing 2 years work for duck all again.
Different Lozaa I think!And I almost find myself siding with Lozza.
If anyone wants a laugh, Lozza singing on Jeremy Vine. That and ligreenie are two of the funniest things on YouTube.